Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Articles
DOI: 10.14254/1795-6889.2026.22-1.6
Submitted: 2026-03-19
Published: 2026-04-29

Digitalized labor markets and migration: The role of remote working technologies on the social integration of highly skilled migrants

Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Istanbul Beykent University, Istanbul, Turkey; Azerbaijan State University of Economics (UNEC), Baku, Azerbaijan
Vytautas Magnus University, Kaunas, Lithuania
remote working highly skilled migrants social integration Technology Acceptance Model Eastern Europe Panel Data Analysis

Abstract

This study empirically examines the impact of digitalization dynamics and remote work technologies on the social integration processes of highly skilled migrants displaced to Eastern Europe after the Russia-Ukraine war. Panel dataset for the period 2015–2025 covering Poland, Czechia, Slovakia, Hungary, Romania, and Bulgaria; Fixed Effects analyzed Pooled OLS, Random Effects, and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) methods. The theoretical framework is based on the synthesis of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), Berry's Acculturation Model, and Social Capital Theory. The findings reveal that the Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI) has a strong, positive impact on the professional integration of highly skilled migrants. The unexpected negative mediator effect of digital competence indicates that excessive reliance on remote work carries the risk of "digital isolation". The regulatory role of digital infrastructure was found to be statistically insignificant. The findings introduce the 'Digitally Mediated Acculturation Model' to the literature and offer concrete suggestions for hybrid integration policies. Given data constraints, this study employs the employment rate of tertiary-educated non-EU nationals as a proxy for professional integration of highly skilled migrants. The findings introduce the "Digitally Mediated Acculturation Model" to the literature and offer concrete suggestions for hybrid integration policies.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. Arias, V. S., & Punyanunt-Carter, N. M. (2023). Exploring relationship expectations and communication motives in the use of the dating APP Tinder. Human Technology, 19(3), 307–324. https://doi.org/10.14254/1795-6889.2023.19-3.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14254/1795-6889.2023.19-3.1
  2. Baltagi, B. H. (2021). Econometric Analysis of Panel Data (6th ed.). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53953-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53953-5
  3. Becker, W. J., Belkin, L. Y., Tuskey, S., & Conroy, S. (2022). Surviving remotely: How job control and loneliness during a forced shift to remote work impacted employee work behaviors and well-being. Human Resource Management, 61(4), 449–464. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.22102 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.22102
  4. Belzunegui-Eraso, A., & Erro-Garcés, A. (2020). Teleworking during the Covid-19 crisis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(11), 3711. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17113711
  5. Berry, J. W. (1997). Immigration, acculturation, and adaptation. Applied Psychology, 46(1), 5–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.1997.tb01087.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.1997.tb01087.x
  6. Bilan, Y., Mishchuk, H., & Oliinyk, O. (2025). Migration of highly skilled workers as a driver of digital economy development. Knowledge and Performance Management, 9(2), 113-123. doi:10.21511/kpm.09(2).2025.09 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21511/kpm.09(2).2025.09
  7. Choudhury, P., Foroughi, C., & Larson, B. (2021). Work-from-anywhere: The productivity effects of geographic flexibility. Strategic Management Journal, 42(4), 655–683. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3251 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3251
  8. Chugaievska, S., & Wisła, R. (2023). A new wave of migration in Ukraine on the background of Russian invasion: Dynamics, challenges and risks. Journal of International Studies, 16(4), 220-244. doi:10.14254/2071-8330.2023/16-4/15 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2023/16-4/15
  9. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94(Supplement), S95–S120. https://doi.org/10.1086/228943 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/228943
  10. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  11. Dekker, R., & Engbersen, G. (2014). How social media transform migrant networks and facilitate migration. Global Networks, 14(4), 401–418. https://doi.org/10.1111/glob.12040 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/glob.12040
  12. Docquier, F., & Rapoport, H. (2012). Globalization, brain drain, and development. Journal of Economic Literature, 50(3), 681–730. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.50.3.681 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.50.3.681
  13. Driscoll, J. C., & Kraay, A. C. (1998). Consistent covariance matrix estimation with spatially dependent panel data. Review of Economics and Statistics, 80(4), 549–560. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465398557825 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/003465398557825
  14. Ejdys, J., Czerwińska, M., & Ginevičius, R. (2024). Social acceptance of artificial intelligence (AI) applications for improving medical service diagnostics. Human Technology, 20(1), 155–177. https://doi.org/10.14254/1795-6889.2024.20-1.7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14254/1795-6889.2024.20-1.8
  15. Eurofound (2020). Living, Working and COVID-19: First Findings. Publications Office of the European Union.
  16. European Commission / EACEA / Eurydice (2022). Supporting Refugee Learners from Ukraine in Higher Education in Europe. Publications Office of the European Union. https://eurydice.eacea.ec.europa.eu/publications/supporting-refugee-learners-ukraine-higher-education-europe-2022
  17. European Commission (2022). Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI) 2022 Report. European Commission. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/desi
  18. European Commission (2022). Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI) 2022. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/desi
  19. European Commission (2023). Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI) 2023.
  20. European Commission (2024). Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI) 2024.
  21. Fedyuk, O., & Kindler, M. (2016). Ukrainian Migration to the European Union: Lessons from Migration Studies. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41776-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41776-9
  22. Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380. https://doi.org/10.1086/225469 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/225469
  23. Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
  24. Hausman, J. A. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica, 46(6), 1251–1271. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913827 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1913827
  25. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
  26. ILO (2020). Teleworking during the COVID-19 Pandemic and Beyond: A Practical Guide. International Labor Organization. https://www.ilo.org/travail/info/working/WCMS_751232/lang--en/index.htm
  27. Jarecki, W., Olczyk, M., Olczyk, P., & Imreh-Toth, M. (2025). Unveiling scholarly narratives on human technology: A structural topic modeling approach. Human Technology, 21(3), 511–529. https://doi.org/10.14254/1795-6889.2025.21-3.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14254/1795-6889.2025.21-3.2
  28. Kniffin, K. M., Narayanan, J., Anseel, F., Antonakis, J., Ashford, S. P., Bakker, A. B., & Vugt, M. V. (2021). COVID-19 and the workplace: Implications, issues, and insights for future research and action. American Psychologist, 76(1), 63–77. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000716 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000716
  29. Kochaniak, K., Huterska, A., Kwiatkowski, J., & Błażejowski, M. (2024). Threat to life or livelihoods - employment attitudes of Ukrainian war immigrants. Economics and Sociology, 17(2), 224-240. doi:10.14254/2071-789X.2024/17-2/11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2024/17-2/11
  30. Kracke, N., & Klug, C. (2021). Social capital and its effect on labour market (mis)match: Migrants' overqualification in Germany. Journal of International Migration and Integration, 22(3), 1435–1456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12134-021-00817-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12134-021-00817-1
  31. Lancee, B. (2010). The economic returns of immigrants' bonding and bridging social capital. International Migration Review, 44(1), 202–226. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7379.2009.00803.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7379.2009.00803.x
  32. Lata, L. B. (2023). New tech, old exploitation: Gig economy, algorithmic control and migrant labour. Sociology Compass, 17(2), e13028. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.13028 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.13028
  33. Lin, N. (2001). Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815447 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815447
  34. Lipták, K., Horváthné Csolák, E., & Musinszki, Z. (2023). The digital world and atypical work: Perceptions and difficulties of teleworking in Hungary and Romania. Human Technology, 19(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.14254/1795-6889.2023.19-1.2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14254/1795-6889.2023.19-1.2
  35. Luchko, M., Arzamasova, O., & Vovk, I. (2019). Personnel potential of national economy and gross domestic product: The case of Ukraine. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 15(2), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.14254/1800-5845.2019/15-2/4
  36. Lyzwinski, L.-N. (2024). Organizational and occupational health issues with working remotely during the pandemic: A scoping review. Journal of Occupational Health, 66(1), uiae005. https://doi.org/10.1093/joccuh/uiae005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/joccuh/uiae005
  37. Mayer, T., & Zignago, S. (2011). Notes on CEPII's distances measures: The GeoDist database. CEPII Working Paper, 2011-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1994531
  38. McKinney, W. (2022). Python for Data Analysis: Data Wrangling with Pandas, NumPy, and Jupyter (3rd ed.). O'Reilly Media.
  39. Mishchuk, H., Oliinyk, O., Martins, A. N., & Pisula, T. (2025). Migration aspirations of Ukrainian scientists in wartime circumstances: expectations and opportunities for professional development. Economics and Sociology, 18(3), 296312. doi:10.14254/2071-789X.2025/18-3/16 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2025/18-3/16
  40. Mishchuk, H., Czarkowski, J. J., Neverkovets, A., & Lukács, E. (2023). Ensuring Sustainable Development in Light of Pandemic “New Normal” Influence. Sustainability, 15(18), 13979. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813979 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813979
  41. OECD (2023a). International Migration Outlook 2023: Special Focus on Ukrainian Refugees. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/b0f405aa-en
  42. OECD (2023b). Ensuring continued learning for Ukrainian refugees. In Education at a Glance 2023. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/e13bef63-en DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/e13bef63-en
  43. Park, I., Kim, D., Moon, J., Kim, S., Kang, Y., & Bae, S. (2022). Searching for new technology acceptance model under social context: Analyzing determinants of intelligent information technology acceptance. Sustainability, 14(1), 579. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010579 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010579
  44. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. Simon & Schuster. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/358916.361990
  45. Rose, S., & Plana-Golobart, A. (2023). Protecting highly skilled professionals at risk: A global challenge with regional implications. Journal of Academic Freedom, 14. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv34wmsz2
  46. Sanliturk, E., Pahari, S., Konieczna, A., & Zagheni, E. (2023). Global patterns of scholars' migration and economic development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120(4), e2217937120. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2217937120 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2217937120
  47. Siemon, D., & Wolff, A. (2024). Humanization of digital technologies. Human Technology, 20(2), 178–182. https://doi.org/10.14254/1795-6889.2024.20-2.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14254/1795-6889.2024.20-2.0
  48. Soga, L. R., Bolade-Ogunfodun, Y., Mariani, M., Nasr, R., & Laker, B. (2022). Unmasking the other face of flexible working practices: A systematic literature review. Journal of Business Research, 142, 648–662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.01.024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.01.024
  49. Sostero, M., Milasi, S., Hurley, J., Fernandez-Macias, E., & Bisello, M. (2020). Teleworkability and the COVID-19 Crisis: A New Digital Divide? European Commission, JRC Working Papers Series.
  50. Tutar, H., Bilan, S., & Şentürk, Ü. (2025). Is there consistency in ethical sensitivity in artificial intelligence? Human Technology. https://doi.org/10.14254/1795-6889.2025.21-2.4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14254/1795-6889.2025.21-2.4
  51. Tutar, H., Akçi, Y., Zielińska, A., & Vasa, L. (2025). The other side of war or migration and labor market imbalances: Evidence from Eastern Europe for the period 2014–2025. Journal of International Studies, 18(4), 44-64. doi:10.14254/2071- 8330.2025/18-4/3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2025/18-4/3
  52. UNESCO Institute for Statistics (2018). A Global Framework of Reference on Digital Literacy Skills for Indicator 4.4.2 (UIS/2018/ICT/IP/51). UNESCO.
  53. UNHCR (2024). Ukraine Situation: Regional Refugee Response Plan — January–December 2024. United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. https://doi.org/10.2345/unhcr.2024.01
  54. Van Zoonen, W., & Sivunen, A. (2022). The impact of remote work and mediated communication frequency on isolation and psychological distress. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 31(4), 610–621. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2021.2002299 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2021.2002299
  55. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
  56. Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412
  57. Venkatesh, V., Walton, S. M., & Hoehle, H. (2021). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 45(1). https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2021/15901
  58. Vovk, I., & Vovk, Y. (2024). Sustainable personnel management in the hospitality industry: Enhancing organizational performance through employee engagement and commitment. Economics, Management and Sustainability, 9(2), 44–58. https://doi.org/10.14254/jems.2024.9-2.4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14254/jems.2024.9-2.4
  59. Vovk, Y., Vovk, I., Plekan, U., Tson, O., & Oleskyuk, V. (2025). Sustainable and smart logistics centers: Challenges and opportunities for Ukraine's transport system. Journal of Sustainable Development of Transport and Logistics, 10(1), 116–124. https://doi.org/10.14254/jsdtl.2025.10-1.9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14254/jsdtl.2025.10-1.8
  60. Williams, N. (2022). Digital migration studies: An evolution. International Migration Review, 56(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/01979183211048455
  61. Wooldridge, J. M. (2019). Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach (7th ed.). Cengage Learning.
  62. World Economic Forum (2023). The Future of Jobs Report 2023. World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/publications/the-future-of-jobs-report-2023/

How to Cite

Tutar, H., & Bilan, Y. (2026). Digitalized labor markets and migration: The role of remote working technologies on the social integration of highly skilled migrants. Human Technology, 22(1), 121–138. https://doi.org/10.14254/1795-6889.2026.22-1.6