Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Articles
DOI: 10.14254/1795-6889.2024.20-3.8
Submitted: 2024-01-09
Published: 2024-12-19

Distracted parenting: How do parents’ emotional regulation and problematic smartphone use contribute to the interruptions of parent-child interactions?

Department of Psychology, Catholic University of Croatia
Catholic University of Croatia
Catholic University of Croatia
parents interruptions of parent-child interactions technoference emotional regulation smartphone use

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the associations between parents’ difficulties in emotion regulation, risk for smartphone addiction, and interruptions of parent-child interactions. The sample comprised 281 parents (80.9% mothers) who participated in the project “Digital technology in the family: patterns of behavior and effects on child development”. Parents completed the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS-16; Bjureberg et al., 2016) and the Smartphone Addiction Scale (SAS-SV; Kwon et. al., 2013). Additionally, parents rated how often they use and check their smartphones during parent-child interactions on a newly developed scale as an indicator of interruptions. The results show that parents with greater emotion regulation difficulty have a greater risk for smartphone addiction and report a higher frequency of using and checking their smartphones during parent-child face-to-face interactions. Thus, there is a significant indirect effect of emotion regulation challenges, through risk for smartphone addiction, on interruptions of interactions between parents and children. The findings are further examined within the context of parents’ characteristics that may be risk factors for the prevalence of interruptions of parent-child interactions.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. Abels, M., Vanden Abeele, M., Van Telgen, T., & Van Meijl, H. (2018). Nod, nod, ignore: An exploratory observational study on the relation between parental mobile media use and parental responsiveness towards young children. The talking species: Perspectives on the evolutionary, neuronal, and cultural foundations of language, 195-228.
  2. Billieux, J. (2012). Problematic use of the mobile phone: a literature review and a pathways model. Current Psychiatry Reviews, 8, 299–307. https://doi.org/10.2174/157340012803520522
  3. Bjureberg, J., Ljótsson, B., Tull, M. T., Hedman, E., Sahlin, H., Lundh, L. G., ... & Gratz, K. L. (2016). Development and validation of a brief version of the difficulties in emotion regulation scale: the DERS-16. Journal of psychopathology and behavioral assessment, 38, 284-296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-015-9514-x
  4. Brand, M., Laier, C., & Young, K. S. (2014). Internet addiction: coping styles, expectancies, and treatment implications. Frontiers in Psychology, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01256
  5. Cho, K. S., & Lee, J. M. (2017). Influence of smartphone addiction proneness of young children on problematic behaviors and emotional intelligence: Mediating self-assessment effects of parents using smartphones. Computers in Human Behavior, 66, 303-311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.063
  6. Chotpitayasunondh, V., & Douglas, K. M. (2018). The effects of “phubbing” on social interaction. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 48(6), 304-316. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12506
  7. Csibi, S., Griffiths, M. D., Demetrovics, Z., & Szabo, A. (2021). Analysis of problematic smartphone use across different age groups within the ‘components model of addiction’. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 19, 616-631. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-019-00095-0
  8. De-Sola Gutiérrez, J., Rodríguez de Fonseca, F., & Rubio, G. (2016). Cell-phone addiction: A review. Frontiers in psychiatry, 7, 175. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2016.00175
  9. Dolev-Cohen, M., & Ricon, T. (2022). The associations between parents’ technoference, their problematic use of digital technology, and the psychological state of their children. Psychology of Popular Media. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000444
  10. Elias, N, Lemish, D., Dalyot, S., & Floegel, D. (2021). “Where are you?” An observational exploration of parental technoference in public places in the US and Israel. Journal of Children and Media, 15, 376-388. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2020.1815228
  11. Fischer-Grote, L., Kothgassner, O. D., & Felnhofer, A. (2019). Risk factors for problematic smartphone use in children and adolescents: a review of existing literature. Neuropsychiatrie, 33(4), 179-190. https://doi.org/10.1007%2Fs40211-019-00319-8
  12. Giordano, C., Coco, G. L., Salerno, L., & Di Blasi, M. (2021). The role of emotion dysregulation in adolescents’ problematic smartphone use: A study on adolescent/parents triads. Computers in Human Behavior, 115, 106632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106632
  13. Gross, J. J. (2015). Emotion regulation: current status and future prospects. Psychological Inquiry, 26, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2014.940781
  14. Hiniker, A., Sobel, K., Suh, H., Sung, Y. C., Lee, C. P., & Kientz, J. A. (2015). Texting while parenting: How adults use mobile phones while caring for children at the playground. In Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 727-736).
  15. Horwood, S., & Anglim, J. (2019). Problematic smartphone usage and subjective and psychological well-being. Computers in Human Behavior, 97, 44-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.02.028
  16. Horwood, S., & Anglim, J. (2021). Emotion regulation difficulties, personality, and problematic smartphone use. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 24(4), 275-281. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2020.0328
  17. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
  18. Kardefelt-Winther, D., Heeran, A., Schimmenti, A., van Rooij, A., Maurage, P., Carras, M., et al. (2017). How can we conceptualize behavioural addiction without pathologizing common behaviours? Addiction, 112, 1709–1715. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.13763
  19. Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modelling, 3rd. New York: Guilford.
  20. Knitter, B., & Zemp, M. (2020). Digital family life: A systematic review of the impact of parental smartphone use on parent-child interactions. Digital Psychology, 1(1), 29–43. https://doi.org/10.24989/dp.v1i1.1809
  21. Kotrla Topić, M., Merkaš, M., & Bodrožić Selak, M. (2023). The association of technoference and parent-adolescent conflict about smartphone use with the well-being of adolescents, in the publication process
  22. Kushlev, K., & Dunn, E. W. (2019). Smartphones distract parents from cultivating feelings of connection when spending time with their children. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36(6), 1619-1639. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407518769387
  23. Kwon, M., Kim, D. J., Cho, H., & Yang, S. (2013). The smartphone addiction scale: development and validation of a short version for adolescents. PloS one, 8(12), e83558. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0083558
  24. Jokić, B., Ristić Dedić, Z., & Šimon, J. (2022). U potrazi za mjerom između školskog igrališta i TikToka: perspektive djece i mladih o korištenju digitalnih tehnologija.
  25. McDaniel, B. T. (2019). Parent distraction with phones, reasons for use, and impacts on parenting and child outcomes: A review of the emerging research. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 1, 72-80. http://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.139
  26. McDaniel, B. T. (2015). “Technoference”: Everyday intrusions and interruptions of technology in couple and family relationships. In C. J. Bruess (Ed.), Family communication in the age of digital and social media. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
  27. McDaniel PhD, B. T. (2020). Technoference: Parent mobile device use and implications for children and parent-child relationships. Zero To Three, 41(2), 30-36. https://www.zerotothree.org/resources/3763-technoference-parent-mobile-device-use-andimplications-for-children-and-parent-child-relationships
  28. McDaniel, B. T., & Coyne, S. M. (2016). Technology interference in the parenting of young children: Implications for mothers’ perceptions of coparenting. The Social Science Journal, 53(4), 435-443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2016.04.010
  29. McDaniel, B. T., & Radesky, J. S. (2018a). Technoference: Longitudinal associations between parent technology use, parenting stress, and child behavior problems. Pediatric research, 84(2), 210-218. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-018-0052-6
  30. McDaniel, B. T., & Radesky, J. S. (2018b). Technoference: Parent distraction with technology and associations with child behavior problems. Child development, 89(1), 100-109. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12822
  31. McDaniel, B. T., Pater, J., Cornet, V., Mughal, S., Reining, L., Schaller, A., ... & Drouin, M. (2023). Parents’ desire to change phone use: Associations with objective smartphone use and feelings about problematic use and distraction. Computers in Human Behavior, 107907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107907
  32. Meeus, A., Coenen, L., Eggermont, S., & Beullens, K. (2021). Family technoference: Exploring parent mobile device distraction from children’s perspectives. Mobile Media & Communication, 9(3), 584-604. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157921991602
  33. Merkaš, M., Perić, K., & Žulec, A. (2021). Parent Distraction with Technology and Child Social Competence during the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Role of Parental Emotional Stability. Journal of Family Communication, 21(3), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2021.1931228
  34. Morris, A.J., Filippetti, M.L., & Rigato, S. (2022). The impact of parents’ smartphone use on language development in young children. Child Development Perspectives, 16(2), 103-109. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12449
  35. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2020). Mplus user’s guide, 8th ed. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
  36. Newsham, G., Drouin, M., & McDaniel, B. T. (2020). Problematic phone use, depression, and technology interference among mothers. Psychology of Popular Media, 9(2), 117–124. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/ppm0000220
  37. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior research methods, 40(3), 879-891. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
  38. Radesky, J. S., Kistin, C. J., Zuckerman, B., Nitzberg, K., Gross, J., Kaplan-Sanoff, M., Augustyn, M., & Silverstein, M. (2014). Patterns of mobile device use by caregivers and children during meals in fast food restaurants. Pediatrics, 133(4), e843–e849. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2013-3703
  39. Radesky, J. S., Kistin, C., Eisenberg, S., Gross, J., Block, G., Zuckerman, B., & Silverstein, M. (2016). Parent perspectives on their mobile technology use: The excitement and exhaustion of parenting while connected. Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, 37(9), 694-701. 10.1097/DBP.0000000000000357
  40. Shahidin, S. H., Midin, M., Sidi, H., Choy, C. L., Nik Jaafar, N. R., Mohd Salleh Sahimi, H., & Che Roos, N. A. (2022). The relationship between emotion regulation (ER) and problematic smartphone use (PSU): A systematic review and meta-analyses. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(23), 15848. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192315848
  41. Squires, L. R., Hollett, K. B., Hesson, J., & Harris, N. (2021). Psychological distress, emotion dysregulation, and coping behaviour: a theoretical perspective of problematic smartphone use. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 19, 1284-1299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-020-00224-0
  42. Stockdale, L. A., Coyne, S. M., & Padilla-Walker, L. M. (2018). Parent and child technoference and socioemotional behavioral outcomes: A nationally representative study of 10- to 20-year-old adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior, 88, 219-226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.06.034
  43. Sundqvist, A., Heimann, M., & Koch, F. S. (2020). Relationship between family technoference and behavior problems in children aged 4–5 years. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 23(6), 371-376. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2019.0512
  44. Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2007). Online communication and adolescent well-being: Testing the stimulation versus the displacement hypothesis. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1169-1182. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00368.x
  45. Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2013). The differential susceptibility to media effects model. Journal of communication, 63(2), 221-243. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12024
  46. Van Velsor, P. R., & Cox, D. L. (2000). Use of the collaborative drawing technique in school counseling practicum: An illustration of family systems. Counselor Education and Supervision, 40(2), 141-152. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6978.2000.tb01245.x
  47. Wacks, Y., & Weinstein, A. M. (2021). Excessive smartphone use is associated with health problems in adolescents and young adults. Frontiers in psychiatry, 12, 762. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.669042
  48. Yang, X., Jiang, P., & Zhu, L. (2023). Parental problematic smartphone use and children’s executive function: The mediating role of technoference and the moderating role of children’s age. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 63, 219-227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2022.12.017

How to Cite

Bodrožić Selak, M., Merkaš, M., & Žulec Ivanković, A. (2024). Distracted parenting: How do parents’ emotional regulation and problematic smartphone use contribute to the interruptions of parent-child interactions?. Human Technology, 20(3), 577–591. https://doi.org/10.14254/1795-6889.2024.20-3.8