Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Articles
DOI: 10.14254/1795-6889.2026.22-1.8
Submitted: 2026-04-29
Published: 2026-04-29

Generation Z and artificial intelligence: Usage patterns and delegation boundaries

Brno University of Technology, Czechia; University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland
Brno University of Technology, Czechia; Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Poland
Brno University of Technology, Czechia
AI adoption youth generation Z human-AI collaboration delegation automation future of work

Abstract

This study examines the use of artificial intelligence (AI), delegation preferences, and perceptions of the future of work among Generation Z representatives, shedding light on emerging patterns of human-AI interaction and delegation. The analysis is based on a cross-sectional survey. The results indicate widespread and frequent engagement with AI, particularly for learning-related tasks and chatbot interaction, as well as high levels of mobile-based use. Despite this intensive adoption, the willingness to delegate tasks to AI systems remains limited. Most respondents reject delegation across contexts such as financial decisions, monitoring, and communication, and, where accepted, delegation is typically conditional on human oversight rather than full autonomy. Perceptions of the future of work emphasise transformation rather than displacement. Respondents most commonly expect hybrid models in which human work is supported by AI tools, alongside a strong expectation of the need for retraining. Overall, the findings highlight a tension between high AI usage and constrained trust in autonomous decision-making, suggesting that Generation Z engages with AI as a supportive resource while maintaining strong preferences for human control. This contributes to ongoing discussions on human-technology relationship in which Gen Z engages AI primarily as a supportive tool while safeguarding human control, thereby contributing to understandings of trust, agency, and socio-technical change in future work practices.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. Abbas, A., Azar, B. B., Mahrishi, M., Martín-Núñez, J. L. ., & Mishra, D. (2025). AI governance in higher education: A meta-analytic thematic review of current research trends, policy initiatives and knowledge gaps. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 20(4), 1257-1300. https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.3551 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.3551
  2. Husairi, M. A., & Rossi, P. (2024). Delegation of purchasing tasks to AI: The role of perceived choice and decision autonomy. Decision Support Systems, 179, 114166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2023.114166 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2023.114166
  3. Aldoseri, A., Al-Khalifa, K. N., & Hamouda, A. M. (2024). AI-powered innovation in digital transformation: Key pillars and industry impact. Sustainability, 16(5), Article 1790. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16051790 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16051790
  4. Babashahi, L., Barbosa, C. E., Lima, Y., Lyra, A., Salazar, H., Argôlo, M., ... & Souza, J. M. D. (2024). AI in the workplace: A systematic review of skill transformation in the industry. Administrative Sciences, 14(6), 127. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14060127 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14060127
  5. Balcerzak, A. P., Zinecker, M., & Mičánek, J. (2025a). The impact of artificial intelligence on task performance and decision-making: Empirical evidence on generation Z. Human Technology, 21(3), 620–639. https://doi.org/10.14254/1795-6889.2025.21-3.7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14254/1795-6889.2025.21-3.7
  6. Balcerzak, A. P., Škapa, A., Gedeon, T., & Lăzăroiu, G. (2025b). AI proliferation: From organizational change to long-term, massive unemployment? Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 20(4), 1223–1231. https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.4042 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.4042
  7. Balcerzak, A. P., Škapa, S., & Zinecker, M. (2025c). Start ups and artificial intelligence: From application to value, and the five problems that shape effective implementation. Oeconomia Copernicana, 16(4), 1369-1376. https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.4057 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.4057
  8. Balcerzak, A. P., & Valaskova, K. (2024). Artificial intelligence: Financial management under pressure of transformative technology. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 19(4), 1127-1137. https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.3394 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.3394
  9. Balcerzak, A. P., Valaskova, K., & Nagy, M. (2025d). Artificial intelligence in financial decision-making: Enhancing portfolio management and risk assessment. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 20(3), 863-875. https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.3884 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.3884
  10. Balcerzak, A. P., Valaskova, K., Nagy, M., & Kramaric, T. P. (2025e). The Internet of Things in financial services: Real-time data for smarter asset management and insurance underwriting. Oeconomia Copernicana, 16(3), 901-919. https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.3898 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.3898
  11. Brandtzaeg, P. B., Følstad, A., & Skjuve, M. (2025). Emerging AI individualism: how young people integrate social AI into everyday life. Communication and Change, 1(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44382-025-00011-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44382-025-00011-2
  12. Bilan, Y., Oliinyk, O., Mishchuk, H., & Streimikiene, D. (2026). Ensuring the Quality of Higher Education and its Impact on Country Attractiveness for International Students. Contemporary Economics, 20(1), 23-37. https://doi.org/10.5709/ce.1897-9254.580 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5709/ce.1897-9254.580
  13. Canady, V. A. (2025). Youth report high engagement, helpfulness of AI MH tools. Mental Health Weekly, 35(44), 5-5. https://doi.org/10.1002/mhw.34667 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mhw.34667
  14. Candrian, C., & Scherer, A. (2022). Rise of the machines: Delegating decisions to autonomous AI. Computers in Human Behavior, 134, 107308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107308 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107308
  15. Chatterjee, S., Rana, N. P., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Baabdullah, A. M. (2021). Understanding AI adoption in manufacturing and production firms using an integrated TAM–TOE model. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 170, Article 120880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120880. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120880
  16. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  17. Desveaud, K., & Bawack, R. (2026). Integrating the Literature on AI Adoption: A Socio-Technical Framework. International Journal of Market Research, 68(2), 219-240. https://doi.org/10.1177/14707853251383383 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14707853251383383
  18. Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Ismagilova, E., Aarts, G., Coombs, C., Crick, T., ... & Williams, M. D. (2021). Artificial Intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. International journal of information management, 57, 101994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.08.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.08.002
  19. Eltahir, M. E., & Babiker, F. M. E. (2024). The influence of artificial intelligence tools on student performance in e-learning environments: Case study. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 22(9), 91-110. https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.22.9.3639 DOI: https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.22.9.3639
  20. Fošner, A. (2024). University students’ attitudes and perceptions towards AI tools: Implications for sustainable educational practices. Sustainability, 16(19), 8668. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16198668 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16198668
  21. Gama, F., & Magistretti, S. (2025). Artificial intelligence in innovation management: A review of innovation capabilities and a taxonomy of AI applications. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 42(1), 76-111. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12698 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12698
  22. Gerlich, M. (2025). AI tools in society: Impacts on cognitive offloading and the future of critical thinking. Societies, 15(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15010006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15010006
  23. Gogoll, J., & Uhl, M. (2018). Rage against the machine: Automation in the moral domain. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 74, 97-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2018.04.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2018.04.003
  24. Granström, M., & Oppi, P. (2025, October). Student engagement with AI tools in learning: evidence from a large-scale Estonian survey. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 10, p. 1688092). Frontiers Media SA. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1688092 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1688092
  25. García-Martínez, I., Fernández-Batanero, J. M., Fernández-Cerero, J., & León, S. P. (2023). Analysing the impact of artificial intelligence and computational sciences on student performance: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 12(1), 171-197. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2023.1.1240 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2023.1.1240
  26. Hassan, M., Kushniruk, A., & Borycki, E. (2024). Barriers to and facilitators of artificial intelligence adoption in health care: scoping review. JMIR Human Factors, 11, e48633. https://doi.org/10.2196/48633 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/48633
  27. Horani, O. M., Al-Adwan, A. S., Yaseen, H., Hmoud, H., Al-Rahmi, W. M., & Alkhalifah, A. (2025). The critical determinants impacting artificial intelligence adoption at the organizational level. Information Development, 41(3), 1055-1079. https://doi.org/10.1177/02666669231166889. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/02666669231166889
  28. Ismatullaev, U. V. U., & Kim, S. H. (2024). Review of the factors affecting acceptance of AI-infused systems. Human factors, 66(1), 126-144. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187208211064707 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00187208211064707
  29. Khanfar, A. A., Kiani Mavi, R., Iranmanesh, M., & Gengatharen, D. (2025). Factors influencing the adoption of artificial intelligence systems: a systematic literature review. Management Decision, 63(10), 3727-3755. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-05-2023-0838 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-05-2023-0838
  30. Klarin, J., Hoff, E., Larsson, A., & Daukantaitė, D. (2024). Adolescents’ use and perceived usefulness of generative AI for schoolwork: exploring their relationships with executive functioning and academic achievement. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 7, 1415782. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2024.1415782 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2024.1415782
  31. Kliestik, T., Dragomir , R., Băluță, A. V., Grecu, I., Durana , P., Karabolevski , O. L., Kral, P., Balica, R., Suler, P., Bușu, O. V., Bugaj, M., Voinea , D.-V., Vrbka, J., Cocoșatu, M., Grupac, M., Pera, A., & Gajdosikova, D. (2024). Enterprise generative artificial intelligence technologies, Internet of Things and blockchain-based fintech management, and digital twin industrial metaverse in the cognitive algorithmic economy. Oeconomia Copernicana, 15(4), 1183-1221. https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.3109 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.3109
  32. Kozová, K., Grenčíková, A., & Habánik, J. (2024). Building a sustainable future: Gender, education & workforce needs of Gen Z. Economics and Sociology, 17(2), 209-223. doi:10.14254/2071-789X.2024/17-2/10 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2024/17-2/10
  33. Koteczki, R., & Eisinger Balassa, B. (2025). Exploring Generation Z’s acceptance of artificial intelligence in higher education: A TAM and UTAUT-based PLS-SEM and cluster analysis. Education Sciences, 15(8), Article 1044. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15081044 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15081044
  34. Kráľ, Š., Kráľová, L., Gavura, Š., & Bačík, R. (2025). Generational differences in the perception of e-commerce aspects: An empirical study of Slovak consumers. Economics and Sociology, 18(4), 116-130. doi:10.14254/2071-789X.2025/18-4/6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2025/18-4/6
  35. Lazaroiu, G., Gedeon, T., Rogalska, E., Valaskova, K., Nagy, M., Musa, H., Zvarikova, K., Poliak, M., Horak, J., Crețoiu, R. I., Krulicky, T., Ionescu, L., Popa , C., Hurloiu, L. R., Nistor , F., Avram, L. G., & Braga, V. (2024). Digital twin-based cyber-physical manufacturing systems, extended reality metaverse enterprise and production management algorithms, and Internet of Things financial and labor market technologies in generative artificial intelligence economics. Oeconomia Copernicana, 15(3), 837-870. https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.3183 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.3183
  36. Lazaroiu, G., Gedeon, T., Fernando, X., Herciu, M., Grecu, G., Chiru, C., Grecu, I., Pârvu, I., & Guni, C. (2025). The algorithmic management of job loss and creation in the enterprise generative, multimodal, and agentic artificial intelligence economy. Oeconomia Copernicana, 16(4), 1491-1524. https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.3994 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.3994
  37. Leyer, M., & Schneider, S. (2019). Me, you or AI? How do we feel about delegation. In Proceedings of the 27th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), Stockholm & Uppsala, Sweden, June 8-14, 2019. ISBN 978-1-7336325-0-8 Research Papers. https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2019_rp/36
  38. Lubars, B., & Tan, C. (2019). Ask not what AI can do, but what AI should do: Towards a framework of task delegability. Advances in neural information processing systems, 32.
  39. Lin, H., & Chen, Q. (2024). Artificial intelligence (AI)-integrated educational applications and college students’ creativity and academic emotions: students and teachers’ perceptions and attitudes. BMC psychology, 12(1), 487. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-01979-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-01979-0
  40. Mishchuk, H., Samoliuk, N., Krol, V., & Rącka, I. (2025). Digital competences of university graduates: Implications for career success. Human Technology, 21(2), 274–292. https://doi.org/10.14254/1795-6889.2025.21-2.2
  41. Moravec, V., Hynek, N., Gavurova, B., & Kubak, M. (2024). Everyday artificial intelligence unveiled: Societal awareness of technological transformation. Oeconomia Copernicana, 15(2), 367-406. https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2961 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2961
  42. Pinski, M., Adam, M., & Benlian, A. (2023). AI knowledge: Improving AI delegation through human enablement. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1-17). https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3580794 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3580794
  43. Roshchyk, I., Mishchuk, H., Bilan, Y., & Brezina, I. (2024). Determinants of demand for young professionals with tertiary education amidst migration resulting from the war in Ukraine. Intellectual Economics, 18(2), 402–428. DOI: 10.13165/IE-24-18-2-08 DOI: https://doi.org/10.13165/IE-24-18-2-08
  44. Sharma, R., Aakanksha, S., Shrivastava, S., & Singh, S. (2025). The influence of artificial intelligence on students’ creativity: Perspectives and perceptions. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Autonomous Intelligence Research, 2(1), 14. https://dx.doi.org/10.54364/JAIAI.2024.1114 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54364/JAIAI.2024.1114
  45. Škare, M., Porada-Rochoń, M., & Veselica Celić, R. (2025a). The impact of energy price dynamics on artificial intelligence adoption: A cross-country study. Economics and Sociology, 18(4), 40-60. doi:10.14254/2071-789X.2025/18-4/2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2025/18-4/2
  46. Škare, M., Porada-Rochon, M., & Veselica Celić, R. (2025b). Total factor productivity dynamics and the artificial intelligence paradox: Evidence from longmemory analysis. Journal of International Studies, 18(4), 218-242. doi:10.14254/2071- 8330.2025/18-4/11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2025/18-4/11
  47. Song, J., & Lin, H. (2024). Exploring the effect of artificial intelligence intellect on consumer decision delegation: The role of trust, task objectivity, and anthropomorphism. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 23(2), 727-747. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.2234 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.2234
  48. Spychalski, B. (2023). Socio-cultural factors shaping the attitude of Generation Z and Generation Alpha youth towards quality. Journal of Sustainable Development of Transport and Logistics, 8(2), 298–311. https://doi.org/10.14254/jsdtl.2023.8-2.23 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14254/jsdtl.2023.8-2.23
  49. Stefko, R., Frajtova-Michalikova, K., Strakova, J., & Novak, A. (2025). Digital twin-based virtual factory and cyber-physical production systems, collaborative autonomous robotic and networked manufacturing technologies, and enterprise and business intelligence algorithms for industrial metaverse. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 20(1), 389-425. https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.3557 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.3557
  50. Trist, E. L., & Bamforth, K. W. (1951). Some social and psychological consequences of the longwall method of coal-getting: An examination of the psychological situation and defences of a work group in relation to the social structure and technological content of the work system. Human relations, 4(1), 3-38. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872675100400101 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001872675100400101
  51. Țuclea, C.-E., & Poenaru, L.-F. (2026). Generation Z employees’ acceptance and AI use intensity: A moderated mediation model of psychological safety, technostress, and trust. Merits, 6(1), Article 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/merits6010007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/merits6010007
  52. van der Vlist, F., Helmond, A., & Ferrari, F. (2024). Big AI: Cloud infrastructure dependence and the industrialisation of artificial intelligence. Big Data & Society, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517241232630 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517241232630
  53. von Garrel, J., Mayer, J. Artificial Intelligence in studies—use of ChatGPT and AI-based tools among students in Germany. Humanit Soc Sci Commun 10, 799 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02304-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02304-7
  54. Vovk, I., Tson, O., Vovk, Y., Vovk, Y., & Rozhko, N. (2024). Mobility as a Service for tourism: Challenges and opportunities for meeting the needs of tourists in urban environments. Journal of Sustainable Development of Transport and Logistics, 9(2), 137–149. https://doi.org/10.14254/jsdtl.2024.9-2.9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14254/jsdtl.2024.9-2.10
  55. Wang, X., Wang, K., Safi, A., & Umar, M. (2025). How is artificial intelligence technology transforming energy security? New evidence from global supply chains. Oeconomia Copernicana, 16(1), 15-38. https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.3488. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.3488
  56. Wojciechowski, A., & Korjonen-Kuusipuro, K. (2023). How artificial intelligence affects education?. Human Technology, 19(3), 302–306. https://doi.org/10.14254/1795-6889.2023.19-3.0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14254/1795-6889.2023.19-3.0
  57. Xu, W., & Gao, Z. (2024). An intelligent sociotechnical systems (iSTS) framework: Enabling a hierarchical human-centered AI (hHCAI) approach. IEEE transactions on technology and society, 6(1), 31-46. https://doi.org/10.1109/TTS.2024.3486254 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TTS.2024.3486254
  58. Yankouskaya, A., Almourad, M. B., Liebherr, M., Beyahi, F., Xu, G., & Ali, R. (2026). Who lets AI take over? Cross-national variation in willingness to delegate socially important roles to artificial intelligence. AI & Society. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-026-02858-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-026-02858-5
  59. Yarovenko, H., Kuzior, A., Norek, T., & Lopatka, A. (2024). The future of artificial intelligence: Fear, hope or indifference?. Human Technology, 20(3), 611–639. https://doi.org/10.14254/1795-6889.2024.20-3.10 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14254/1795-6889.2024.20-3.10
  60. Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education–where are the educators? International journal of educational technology in higher education, 16(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0

How to Cite

Balcerzak, A. P., Zinecker, M., & Mičánek, J. (2026). Generation Z and artificial intelligence: Usage patterns and delegation boundaries. Human Technology, 22(1), 158–177. https://doi.org/10.14254/1795-6889.2026.22-1.8