Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Articles
DOI: 10.14254/1795-6889.2025.21-2.9
Submitted: 2025-02-21
Published: 2025-10-12

Experiences of learning and support in online courses in open university studies

Faculty of Education and Psychology, University of Jyväskylä, Finland
Finnish Institute for Educational Research, University of Jyväskylä, Finland
Faculty of Education and Psychology, University of Jyväskylä, Finland
Faculty of Education and Psychology, University of Jyväskylä, Finland
online learning online course higher education student experiences instructional support and guidance interaction

Abstract

Studying online has increased in recent decades. In this study, we investigated 1) how adult students experience their learning through online courses, and 2) the support and guidance they receive in an online course? The data were collected through an electronic questionnaire with 182 respondents and analyzed qualitatively using thematic analysis. The findings highlight the importance of interaction with peers and instructors, which, according to the respondents, leads to a profound and broad understanding of the subject being studied. The findings also show that instructional and peer supports for online courses were felt to facilitate studying when easily accessible. However, some adult and experienced students felt that they did not need much instructional support and guidance or peer support. In the future, it will be important to take into account the diversity of the open university student population and their different needs.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. Alqurashi, E. (2019). Predicting student satisfaction and perceived learning within online learning environments. Distance Education, 40(1), 133–148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2018.1553562
  2. Bourdeaux, R., & Schoenack, L. (2016). Adult student expectations and experiences in an online learning environment. Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 64(3), 152–161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07377363.2016.1229072
  3. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  4. Caskurlu, S., Richardson, J., Maeda, Y., & Kozan, K. (2021). The qualitative evidence behind the factors impacting online learning experiences as informed by the community of inquiry framework: A thematic synthesis. Computers & Education, 165, 104111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104111
  5. Dixson, M. D. (2010). Creating effective student engagement in online courses: What do students find engaging? Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 10(2), 1–13.
  6. Dobbs, R. R., Waid-Lindberg, C. A., del Carmen, A. (2017). Students´perceptions of online courses. The effect of online course experience. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 18(1), 93–109.
  7. Farrell, O., & Bruton, J. (2020). A balancing act: a window into online student engagement experiences. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(18). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00199-x
  8. Gökoğlu, S., Yılmaz, F. G. K., & Yılmaz, R. (2024). Students engagement, community of inquiry, and transactional distance in online learning environments: A stepwise multiple linear regression analysis. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 25(4), 105–127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v25i4.7660
  9. Holzweiss, P. C., Joyner, S., Fuller M. B., Henderson, S., & Young, R. (2014). Online graduate students’ perceptions of best learning experiences. Distance Education, 35(3), 311–323. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2015.955262
  10. Jaggars, S. S. (2014). Choosing between online and face-to-face courses: Community college student voices. The American Journal of Distance Education, 28(1), 27–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2014.867697
  11. King, A. (1993). From Sage on the Stage to Guide on the Side. College Teaching, 41(1), 30–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.1993.9926781
  12. Lee, S. J., Srinivasan, S., Trail, T., Lewis, D., & Lopez, S. (2011). Examining the relationship among student perception of support, course satisfaction, and learning outcomes in online learning. Internet and Higher Education, 14(3), 158–164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.04.001
  13. Martin, F., & Bolliger, D. U. (2018). Engagement matters: Student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. The Online Learning Consortium, 22(1), 205–222. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i1.1092
  14. Müller, R. (2013). Careerists or educational aspirants? - (Re-)entry of European lifelong learners into higher education. ELM European Lifelong Learning Magazine. https://elmmagazine.eu/careerists-or-educational-aspirants-re-entry-of-european-lifelong-learners-into-higher-education/
  15. Opintopolku - löydä mahdollisuutesi (2024). [Study Pathway – Find Your Opportunities] https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/topics/anxiety-disorders/index.shtml
  16. Rahmani, A.M., Groot, W. & Rahmani, H. (2024) Dropout in online higher education: a systematic literature review. International Journal of Education Technology in Higher Education, 21, 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00450-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00450-9
  17. Repo, S., Vuoksenranta, S-T., & Ruokolainen, O. (2014). Kuinka avoimen yliopiston opiskelija yhdistää opiskelun, työn ja perheen.[How an Open University student combines studies, work and family] Aikuiskasvatus, 34(4), 259–268. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33336/aik.94106
  18. Rivera-Vargas, P., Anderson, T., & Cano, C. A. (2021). Exploring students’ learning experiences in online education: Analysis and improvement proposals based on the case of a Spanish open learning university. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69, 3367–3389. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10045-0
  19. Roddy, C., Amiet, D. L., Chung, J., Holt, C., Shaw, L. McKenzie, S., Garivaldis, F., Jason, M., & Mundy, M. E. (2017). Applying best practice online learning teaching, and support to intensive online environments: An integrative review. Frontiers in Education, 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2017.00059
  20. Rotar, O. (2022a). A missing theoretical element of online higher education student attrition, retention, and progress: a systematic literature review. SN Social Sciences, 2, 278 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-022-00550-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-022-00550-1
  21. Rotar, O. (2022b). Online student support: A framework for embedding support interventions into the online learning cycle. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 17, 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-021-00178-4
  22. Saraç, M. & Doğan, M. (2022). Evaluation of the instructor-student interaction in online classes: instructors' perspective. E-International Journal of Educational Research, 13(4), 99-112. https://doi.org/10.19160/e-
  23. Shepherd, C. E., Bolliger, D. U., & McKim, C. (2024). Online University Students´ Perceptions of institution and Program Community and the Activities that Support Them. The Online Learning Consortium, 28(1). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v28i1.3673 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v28i1.3673
  24. Sher, A. (2009). Assessing the relationship of student-instructor and student-student interaction to student learning and satisfaction in Web-based Online Learning Environment. Journal of Interactive Online Learning 8(2), 102–120.
  25. Soffer, T., & Cohen, A. (2019). Students’ engagement characteristics predict success and completion of online courses. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 35(3), 378–389. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12340
  26. Stuart, J., O’Donnell, A. W., Scott, R., O’Donnell, K., Lund, R., & Barber, B. (2022). Asynchronous and synchronous remote teaching and academic outcomes during COVID-19. Distance Education, 43(3), 408–425. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2022.2088477
  27. Sun, A., & Chen, X. (2016). Online education and its effective practice: A research review. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 15, 157-190. http://www.informingscience.org/Publications/3502 DOI: https://doi.org/10.28945/3502
  28. Theobald M., & Bellhäuser H. (2022). How am I going and where to next? Elaborated online feedback improves university students’ self-regulated learning and performance. The Internet and Higher Education, 55, 100872. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2022.100872
  29. Tsui, A. B. M., & Ng, M. (2000). Do Secondary 1.2 writers benefit from comments? Journal of Second Language Writing, 9(2), 147–170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(00)00022-9

How to Cite

Kokko, T., Häkkinen, P., Pirttimaa, R., & Hakkarainen, A. (2025). Experiences of learning and support in online courses in open university studies. Human Technology, 21(2), 416–430. https://doi.org/10.14254/1795-6889.2025.21-2.9