Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Articles
DOI: 10.14254/1795-6889.2025.21-1.1
Submitted: 2024-03-24
Published: 2025-05-28

Radical digital agency as a foundation for just and sustainable smart cities

Aalto University
Aalto University
University of Helsinki
Smart city Digital city Digital inequality Digital literacy Digital Divide Socio-digital inequalities

Abstract

The article examines the relationship between smart city development, socio-digital inequality, and digital literacy. Furthermore, we investigate the link between city residents' digital competence and so-called smart citizenship. Through these theoretical explorations, we aim to demonstrate the importance of a more in-depth understanding of digital inequality in the context of people-centric smart cities. We then use examples from our hybrid ethnographic fieldwork in Barcelona to show how these perspectives might manifest in practical applications. Barcelona aspires to be the capital of 'technological humanism' and, in recent years, has implemented a number of digital inclusion initiatives. Based on the theoretical discussion and empirical results, we present a framework that combines the theoretical framing and empirical findings, highlighting the intersecting factors that policymakers and educators must consider when developing just and sustainable smart cities.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. Ahad, M. A., Paiva, S., Tripathi, G., & Feroz, N. (2020). Enabling technologies and sustainable smart cities. Sustainable Cities and Society, 61, 102301. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102301
  2. Albino, V., Berardi, U., & Dangelico, R. M. (2015). Smart cities: Definitions, dimensions, performance, and initiatives. Journal of Urban Technology, 22(1), 3–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2014.942092
  3. Anastasiu, I. (2019). Unpacking the smart city through the lens of the right to the city: A taxonomy as a way forward in participatory city-making. The Hackable City: Digital Media and Collaborative City-Making in the Network Society, 239–260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2694-3_13
  4. Aragón, P., Kaltenbrunner, A., Calleja-López, A., Pereira, A., Monterde, A., Barandiaran, X. E., & Gómez, V. (2017). Deliberative platform design: The case study of the online discussions in Decidim Barcelona. Social Informatics: 9th International Conference, SocInfo 2017, Oxford, UK, September 13-15, 2017, Proceedings, Part II 9, 277–287. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67256-4_22
  5. Arroyo-Menéndez, M., Barañano-Cid, M., & Uceda-Navas, P. (2022). Unequal in the Smart City? Spatial Segregation and Digital Inequalities in Madrid. Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas (REIS), 180(180), 19–71.
  6. Baker, E. H. (2014). Socioeconomic status, definition. The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Health, Illness, Behavior, and Society, 2210–2214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118410868.wbehibs395
  7. BIT Habitat. (2021, January). The Digital Divide in the City of Barcelona. Executive summary. Ajuntament de Barcelona. BIT Habitat. https://citiesfordigitalrights.org/sites/default/files/Executive%20Summary_Digital%20Divide%20Barcelona.2020_0.pdf
  8. Bria, F. (2017). Barcelona City Council technological sovereignty guide (p. 43) [Guide]. Barcelona City Council. https://www.barcelona.cat/digitalstandards/en/tech-sovereignty/0.1/_attachments/barcelona_tech_sovereignty_0.1.en.pdf
  9. Cardullo, P., & Kitchin, R. (2019a). Being a ‘citizen’in the smart city: Up and down the scaffold of smart citizen participation in Dublin, Ireland. GeoJournal, 84(1), 1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-018-9845-8
  10. Cardullo, P., & Kitchin, R. (2019b). Smart urbanism and smart citizenship: The neoliberal logic of ‘citizen-focused’smart cities in Europe. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 37(5), 813–830. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0263774X18806508
  11. Castells, M. (1994). European cities, the informational society, and the global economy. New Left Review, 18–18.
  12. Charnock, G., March, H., & Ribera-Fumaz, R. (2021). From smart to rebel city? Worlding, provincialising and the Barcelona Model. Urban Studies, 58(3), 581–600. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098019872119
  13. Chen, X., Östlund, B., & Frennert, S. (2020). Digital inclusion or digital divide for older immigrants? A scoping review. Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population. Technology and Society: 6th International Conference, ITAP 2020, Held as Part of the 22nd HCI International Conference, HCII 2020, Copenhagen, Denmark, July 19–24, 2020, Proceedings, Part III 22, 176–190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50232-4_13
  14. Choi, M., & Cristol, D. (2021). Digital citizenship with intersectionality lens: Towards participatory democracy driven digital citizenship education. Theory into Practice, 60(4), 361–370. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2021.1987094
  15. Cibernàrium team. (2020, February). Cibernàrium, 20 years of technological skills acquisition and outreach. Development and future challenges. Barcelona Activa - Barcelona City Council. https://cibernarium.barcelonactiva.cat/en/fem-20-anys
  16. Cotter, K., & Reisdorf, B. C. (2020). Algorithmic knowledge gaps: A new horizon of (digital) inequality. International Journal of Communication, 14, 21.
  17. Crang, M., Crosbie, T., & Graham, S. (2006). Variable geometries of connection: Urban digital divides and the uses of information technology. Urban Studies, 43(13), 2551–2570. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980600970664
  18. Cugurullo, F. (2021). Frankenstein urbanism: Eco, smart and autonomous cities, artificial intelligence and the end of the city. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315652627
  19. Digital Future Society. (2022, March). Reflections on what it would mean for Barcelona to become the capital of technological humanism. https://digitalfuturesociety.com/app/uploads/sites/9/2022/03/Reflections_Tech_Humanism_BCN.pdf
  20. DiMaggio, P., Hargittai, E., Celeste, C., Shafer, S., & others. (2004). From unequal access to differentiated use: A literature review and agenda for research on digital inequality. Social Inequality, 1, 355–400.
  21. e Silva, A. de S., & Frith, J. (2012). Mobile interfaces in public spaces: Locational privacy, control, and urban sociability. Routledge.
  22. Echebarria, C., Barrutia, J. M., & Aguado-Moralejo, I. (2021). The Smart City journey: A systematic review and future research agenda. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 34(2), 159–201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2020.1785277
  23. Emejulu, A., & McGregor, C. (2019). Towards a radical digital citizenship in digital education. Critical Studies in Education, 60(1), 131–147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2016.1234494
  24. Fernandez, L., Reisdorf, B., Dutton, W. H., & Hampton, K. (2018). Urban Myths of the Digital Divide: An Exploration of Connectivity, Breadth Of Use, and Interest Across Detroit Neighborhoods.
  25. Haight, M., Quan-Haase, A., & Corbett, B. A. (2014). Revisiting the digital divide in Canada: The impact of demographic factors on access to the internet, level of online activity, and social networking site usage. Information, Communication & Society, 17(4), 503–519. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2014.891633
  26. Hall, R. E., Bowerman, B., Braverman, J., Taylor, J., Todosow, H., & Von Wimmersperg, U. (2000). The vision of a smart city. Brookhaven National Lab.(BNL), Upton, NY (United States).
  27. Hänninen, R., Pajula, L., Korpela, V., & Taipale, S. (2021). Individual and shared digital repertoires–older adults managing digital services. Information, Communication & Society, 1–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.1954976
  28. Hargittai, E. (2010). Digital na (t) ives? Variation in internet skills and uses among members of the “net generation.” Sociological Inquiry, 80(1), 92–113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.2009.00317.x
  29. Hatuka, T., Toch, E., Birnhack, M., & Zur, H. (2020). The Digital City: Critical Dimensions in Implementing the Smart City. Available at SSRN 3766782. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3766782
  30. Hatuka, T., & Zur, H. (2020). Who is the ‘smart’resident in the digital age? The varied profiles of users and non-users in the contemporary city. Urban Studies, 57(6), 1260–1283. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098019835690
  31. Heitlinger, S., Foth, M., & Clarke, R. (2024). Designing More-than-Human Smart Cities: Beyond Sustainability, Towards Cohabitation. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/9780191980060.001.0001
  32. Helsper, E. (2015). Inequalities in digital literacy: Definitions, measurements, explanations and policy implications. Núcleo de Informação e Coordenação Do Ponto BR. Pesquisa Sobre o Uso Das Tecnologias de Informação e Comunicação Nos Domícilios Brasileiros: TIC Domicílios, 175–185.
  33. Helsper, E. (2019). Why location-based studies offer new opportunities for a better understanding of socio-digital inequalities?
  34. Helsper, E. (2021). The digital disconnect: The social causes and consequences of digital inequalities. SAGE Publications Ltd. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526492982
  35. Helsper, E. J., & Eynon, R. (2013). Distinct skill pathways to digital engagement. European Journal of Communication, 28(6), 696–713. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323113499113
  36. Helsper, E. J., & Smahel, D. (2020). Excessive internet use by young Europeans: Psychological vulnerability and digital literacy? Information, Communication & Society, 23(9), 1255–1273. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1563203
  37. Hinrichsen, J., & Coombs, A. (2013). The five resources of critical digital literacy: A framework for curriculum integration. Research in Learning Technology, 21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v21.21334
  38. Hintz, A., Dencik, L., & Wahl-Jorgensen, K. (2017). Digital citizenship and surveillance society: Introduction. International Journal of Communication (Online), 731-. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2016.1266134
  39. Hintz, A. (with Dencik, L., & Wahl-Jorgensen, K.). (2019). Digital citizenship in a datafied society. Polity Press.
  40. Jang, S., & Gim, T.-H. T. (2022). Considerations for encouraging citizen participation by information-disadvantaged groups in smart cities. Sustainable Cities and Society, 76, 103437. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103437
  41. Juris, J. S. (2010). Reinventing the rose of fire: Anarchism and the movements against corporate globalization in Barcelona. Historia Actual Online, 21, 143–155.
  42. Kitchin, R. (2015). Making sense of smart cities: Addressing present shortcomings. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 8(1), 131–136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsu027
  43. Lee, J. H., Hancock, M. G., & Hu, M.-C. (2014). Towards an effective framework for building smart cities: Lessons from Seoul and San Francisco. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 89, 80–99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.08.033
  44. Lefebvre, H. (1996). 1996. The right to the city. In E. Kofman & E. Lebas (Eds.), Writings on cities (pp. 147–159). Blackwell Publishers.
  45. Liu, R.-F. (2022). Hybrid ethnography: Access, positioning, and data assembly. Ethnography, 14661381221145451. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14661381221145451
  46. Livingstone, S., Stoilova, M., & Nandagiri, R. (2020). Data and privacy literacy: The role of the school in educating children in a datafied society. The Handbook of Media Education Research, 413–425. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119166900.ch38
  47. Lutz, C. (2019). Digital inequalities in the age of artificial intelligence and big data. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 1(2), 141–148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.140
  48. Luusua, A., Ylipulli, J., & Rönkkö, E. (2017). Nonanthropocentric design and smart cities in the anthropocene. IT-Information Technology, 59(6), 295–304. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/itit-2017-0007
  49. Madden, M., & Rainie, L. (2003). America’s online pursuits. Pew Research Center.
  50. Marín, V. I., & Castaneda, L. (2023). Developing digital literacy for teaching and learning. In Handbook of open, distance and digital education (pp. 1089–1108). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2080-6_64
  51. Martin, C. J., Evans, J., & Karvonen, A. (2018). Smart and sustainable? Five tensions in the visions and practices of the smart-sustainable city in Europe and North America. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 133, 269–278. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.01.005
  52. McFarlane, C., & Söderström, O. (2017). On alternative smart cities: From a technology-intensive to a knowledge-intensive smart urbanism. City, 21(3–4), 312–328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2017.1327166
  53. Mesch, G. S., & Talmud, I. (2011). Ethnic differences in Internet access: The role of occupation and exposure. Information, Communication & Society, 14(4), 445–471. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2011.562218
  54. Monachesi, P. (2020). Shaping an alternative smart city discourse through Twitter: Amsterdam and the role of creative migrants. Cities, 100, 102664. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102664
  55. Nam, T., & Pardo, T. A. (2011). Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions. Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference: Digital Government Innovation in Challenging Times, 282–291. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2037556.2037602
  56. Nations, U. (2018). World Urbanisation Prospects: The 2018 Revision (Key Facts).
  57. Neirotti, P., De Marco, A., Cagliano, A. C., Mangano, G., & Scorrano, F. (2014). Current trends in Smart City initiatives: Some stylised facts. Cities, 38, 25–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2013.12.010
  58. Pangrazio, L. (2016). Reconceptualising critical digital literacy. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 37(2), 163–174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2014.942836
  59. Pangrazio, L., & Sefton-Green, J. (2021). Digital rights, digital citizenship and digital literacy: What’s the difference? NAER: Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 10(1), 15–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2021.1.616
  60. Passey, D., Shonfeld, M., Appleby, L., Judge, M., Saito, T., & Smits, A. (2018). Digital agency: Empowering equity in and through education. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 23, 425–439. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-018-9384-x
  61. Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2006). Adolescents’ internet use: Testing the “disappearing digital divide” versus the “emerging digital differentiation” approach. Poetics, 34(4–5), 293–305. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2006.05.005
  62. Ritchie, H., & Roser, M. (2018). Urbanization. Our World in Data.
  63. Robinson, L., Cotten, S. R., Ono, H., Quan-Haase, A., Mesch, G., Chen, W., Schulz, J., Hale, T. M., & Stern, M. J. (2015). Digital inequalities and why they matter. Information, Communication & Society, 18(5), 569–582. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1012532
  64. Rosol, M., Blue, G., & Fast, V. (2019). Social justice in the digital age: Re-thinking the smart city with Nancy Fraser. UCCities Working Paper# 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/wkqy2
  65. Rushton, Steve. (2019, May 24). Rebel Cities 25: Barcelona en Comú Reclaims the City and Reimagines the World. Occypy.Com. https://www.occupy.com/article/rebel-cities-25-barcelona-en-com-reclaims-city-and-reimagines-world#sthash.hbB9QBph.dpbs
  66. Shamsuddin, S., & Srinivasan, S. (2021). Just smart or just and smart cities? Assessing the literature on housing and information and communication technology. Housing Policy Debate, 31(1), 127–150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2020.1719181
  67. Sheikh, H., Mitchell, P., & Foth, M. (2023). More-than-human smart urban governance: A research agenda. Digital Geography and Society, 4, 100045. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diggeo.2022.100045
  68. Singh, Y. J. (2020). Is smart mobility also gender-smart? Journal of Gender Studies, 29(7), 832–846. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2019.1650728
  69. Tomitsch, M., Fredericks, J., Vo, D., Frawley, J., & Foth, M. (2021). Non-human personas: Including nature in the participatory design of smart cities. Interaction Design and Architecture (s), 50(50), 102–130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55612/s-5002-050-007
  70. Toscano, A. A. (2011). Using I, robot in the technical writing classroom: Developing a critical technological awareness. Computers and Composition, 28(1), 14–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2010.12.001
  71. Vadiati, N. (2022). Alternatives to smart cities: A call for consideration of grassroots digital urbanism. Digital Geography and Society, 100030. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diggeo.2022.100030
  72. Van Deursen, A. J., & Helsper, E. J. (2018). Collateral benefits of Internet use: Explaining the diverse outcomes of engaging with the Internet. New Media & Society, 20(7), 2333–2351. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817715282
  73. Van Deursen, A. J., & Van Dijk, J. A. (2009). Using the Internet: Skill related problems in users’ online behavior. Interacting with Computers, 21(5–6), 393–402. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2009.06.005
  74. Van Deursen, A. J., & Van Dijk, J. A. (2014). The digital divide shifts to differences in usage. New Media & Society, 16(3), 507–526. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813487959
  75. Van Deursen, A. J., Van Dijk, J. A., & Peters, O. (2011). Rethinking Internet skills: The contribution of gender, age, education, Internet experience, and hours online to medium-and content-related Internet skills. Poetics, 39(2), 125–144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2011.02.001
  76. Van Dijk, J. A. (2005). The deepening divide: Inequality in the information society. Sage publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452229812
  77. Vanolo, A. (2014). Smartmentality: The smart city as disciplinary strategy. Urban Studies, 51(5), 883–898. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098013494427
  78. Vee, A. (2017). Coding literacy: How computer programming is changing writing. Mit Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/10655.001.0001
  79. Wasserman, I. M., & Richmond-Abbott, M. (2005). Gender and the Internet: Causes of variation in access, level, and scope of use. Social Science Quarterly, 86(1), 252–270. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0038-4941.2005.00301.x
  80. Williamson, B. (2015). Educating the smart city: Schooling smart citizens through computational urbanism. Big Data & Society, 2(2), 2053951715617783. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951715617783
  81. Yigitcanlar, T. (2021). Smart City Beyond Efficiency: Technology–Policy–Community at Play for Sustainable Urban Futures. In Housing Policy Debate (Vol. 31, Issue 1, pp. 88–92). Taylor & Francis. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2020.1846885
  82. Yigitcanlar, T., Foth, M., & Kamruzzaman, M. (2019). Towards post-anthropocentric cities: Reconceptualizing smart cities to evade urban ecocide. Journal of Urban Technology, 26(2), 147–152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2018.1524249
  83. Ylipulli, J., & Hämäläinen, J. (2023). Towards practice-oriented framework for digital inequality in smart cities. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Communities and Technologies, 180–190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3593743.3593781
  84. Ylipulli, J., & Luusua, A. (2019). Without libraries what have we? Public libraries as nodes for technological empowerment in the era of smart cities, AI and big data. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Communities & Technologies-Transforming Communities, 92–101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3328320.3328387
  85. Ylipulli, J., & Luusua, A. (2020). Smart cities with a Nordic twist? Public sector digitalization in Finnish data-rich cities. Telematics and Informatics, 55, 101457. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101457
  86. Ylipulli, J., & Suopajärvi, T. (2013). Contesting ubicomp visions through ICT practices: Power negotiations in the meshwork of a technologised city. International Communication Gazette, 75(5–6), 538–554. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048513491911
  87. Ylipulli, J., & Vigren, M. (2023). From skilled users to critical citizens? Imagining and future-making as part of digital citizenship. In D. Radovanović (Ed.), Digital Literacy and Inclusion: Stories, Platforms, Communities. Springer Nature. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30808-6_2
  88. Zaman, S., & Hertweck, C. (2022). Methods for uncovering discourses that shape the urban imaginary in Helsinki’s smart city. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, 4, 9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2022.796469
  89. Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power: Barack Obama’s books of 2019. Profile books.

How to Cite

Ylipulli, J., Hämäläinen, J. ., & Palo, E. (2025). Radical digital agency as a foundation for just and sustainable smart cities. Human Technology, 21(1), 6–34. https://doi.org/10.14254/1795-6889.2025.21-1.1