Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Articles
DOI: 10.14254/1795-6889.2024.20-3.11
Submitted: 2024-03-15
Published: 2024-12-19

Surfing, scrolling and stressing: Technostress in browsing digital content feeds on smartphones from the gratifications and dimensions of use perspective

University of Jyvaskyla, Faculty of Information Technology
University of Jyvaskyla, Faculty of Information Technology
Tampere University, Information and Knowledge Management Unit
technostress uses and gratifications theory dimension of use smartphone qualitative research

Abstract

In this study, we investigate how the nature of activities users perform to interact with information delivered via smartphones (i.e., dimensions of smartphone use), along with gratifications sought and obtained, contribute to technostress in the context of digital content feeds. By applying qualitative research methods and analyzing data gathered through 30 semi-structured interviews, we identify five dimensions of smartphone use: instant, repeated, continuous, personalized, and versatile. Introducing the concept of smartphone use loop, we reveal the dynamic relationships between these dimensions, gratifications, and technostress, illustrating how different dimensions of use and underlying gratifications can lead to diverse technostress experiences (e.g., depending on whether the gratifications sought are obtained). Furthermore, we identify previously unexplored technostressors and strains, such as gratification mismatch and worsened boredom tolerance. By integrating uses and gratifications theory with technostress research, this study offers a novel framework for understanding the dual nature of smartphone use.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. Ardèvol-Abreu, A., Delponti, P., Bonache, H., & Rodríguez-Wangüemert, C. (2023). Mobile instant messaging uses and technostress: a qualitative approach. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 39(15), 3003–3015. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2090525
  2. Ayyagari, R., Grover, V., & Purvis, R. (2011). Technostress: Technological antecedents and implications. MIS Quarterly, 35(4), 831–858. https://doi.org/10.2307/41409963
  3. Baabdullah, A. M., Alsulaimani, A. A., Allamnakhrah, A., Alalwan, A. A., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Rana, N. P. (2022). Usage of augmented reality (AR) and development of e-learning outcomes: An empirical evaluation of students’ e-learning experience. Computers & Education, 177, 104383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104383
  4. Bae, M. (2018). Understanding the effect of the discrepancy between sought and obtained gratification on social networking site users’ satisfaction and continuance intention. Computers in Human Behavior, 79, 137–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.10.026
  5. Blank, G., & Groselj, D. (2014). Dimensions of Internet use: Amount, variety, and types. Information, Communication & Society, 17(4), 417–435. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2014.889189
  6. Bonds-Raacke, J., & Raacke, J. (2010). MySpace and Facebook: Identifying dimensions of uses and gratifications for friend networking sites. Individual Differences Research, 8(1), 27–33.
  7. Brandtzæg, P. B. (2010). Towards a unified Media-User Typology (MUT): A meta-analysis and review of the research literature on media-user typologies. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(5), 940–956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.02.008
  8. Brod, C. (1982). Managing technostress: Optimizing the use of computer technology. Personnel Journal, 61(10), 753–757.
  9. Brooks, S. (2015). Does personal social media usage affect efficiency and well-being?. Computers in Human Behavior, 46, 26–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.053
  10. Califf, C.B., Sarker, S., & Sarker, S. (2020). The bright and dark sides of technostress: A mixed methods study involving healthcare IT. MIS Quarterly, 44(2), 809–856. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2020/14818
  11. Cao, X., & Sun, J. (2018). Exploring the effect of overload on the discontinuous intention of social media users: An SOR perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 81, 10–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.11.035
  12. Cao, X., Masood, A., Luqman, A., & Ali, A. (2018). Excessive use of mobile social networking sites and poor academic performance: Antecedents and consequences from stressor-strain-outcome perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 85, 163–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.03.023
  13. Caplan, S. E. (2010). Theory and measurement of generalized problematic Internet use: A two-step approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(5), 1089–1097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.012
  14. Cavanaugh, M.A., Boswell, W.R., Roehling, M.V., & Boudreau, J.W. (2000). An empirical examination of self-reported work stress among US managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(1), 65–74. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.1.65
  15. Chaouali, W. (2016). Once a user, always a user: Enablers and inhibitors of continuance intention of mobile social networking sites. Telematics and Informatics, 33(4), 1022–1033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2016.03.006
  16. Charles, S. T., Piazza, J. R., Mogle, J., Sliwinski, M. J., & Almeida, D. M. (2013). The wear and tear of daily stressors on mental health. Psychological Science, 24(5), 733–741. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612462222
  17. Cheikh-Ammar, M. (2020). The bittersweet escape to information technology: An investigation of the stress paradox of social network sites. Information & Management, 57(8), 103368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2020.103368
  18. Chiu, C. M., Tan, C. M., Hsu, J. S. C., & Cheng, H. L. (2023). Employee deviance: the impacts of techno-insecurity and moral disengagement. Information Technology & People, 36(1), 140–164. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-03-2021-0198
  19. Cooper, C., Dewe, P., & O’Driscoll, M. (2001). Organizational stress: A review and critique of theory, research, and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452231235
  20. Cutler, N.E., & Danowski, J.A. (1980). Process gratification in aging cohorts. Journalism Quarterly, 57 (2), 269–276. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769908005700210
  21. Dén‐Nagy, I. (2014). A double‐edged sword? A critical evaluation of the mobile phone in creating work–life balance. New Technology, Work and Employment, 29(2), 193–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12031
  22. Dhir, A., Yossatorn, Y., Kaur, P., & Chen, S. (2018). Online social media fatigue and psychological wellbeing—A study of compulsive use, fear of missing out, fatigue, anxiety and depression. International Journal of Information Management, 40, 141–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.01.012
  23. Duke, É., & Montag, C. (2017). Smartphone addiction, daily interruptions and self-reported productivity. Addictive Behaviors Reports, 6, 90–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.abrep.2017.07.002
  24. Elhai, J. D., Levine, J. C., Dvorak, R. D., & Hall, B. J. (2017). Non-social features of smartphone use are most related to depression, anxiety and problematic smartphone use. Computers in Human Behavior, 69, 75–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.023
  25. Fischer, T., & Riedl, R. (2017). Technostress research: A nurturing ground for measurement pluralism?. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 40(1), 375–401. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.04017
  26. Fox, J., & Moreland, J. J. (2015). The dark side of social networking sites: An exploration of the relational and psychological stressors associated with Facebook use and affordances. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 168–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.083
  27. Fu, S., Li, H., Liu, Y., Pirkkalainen, H., & Salo, M. (2020). Social media overload, exhaustion, and use discontinuance: Examining the effects of information overload, system feature overload, and social overload. Information Processing & Management, 57(6), 102307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2020.102307
  28. Gentina, E., & Rowe, F. (2020). Effects of materialism on problematic smartphone dependency among adolescents: The role of gender and gratifications. International Journal of Information Management, 54, 102134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102134
  29. Gerlach, J. P., & Cenfetelli, R. T. (2020). Constant checking is not addiction: A grounded theory of IT-mediated state-tracking. MIS Quarterly, 44(4), 1705–1732. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2020/15685
  30. Güğerçin, U. (2020). Does techno-stress justify cyberslacking? An empirical study based on the neutralisation theory. Behaviour & Information Technology, 39(7), 824–836. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2019.1617350
  31. Ha, Y. W., Kim, J., Libaque-Saenz, C. F., Chang, Y., & Park, M. C. (2015). Use and gratifications of mobile SNSs: Facebook and KakaoTalk in Korea. Telematics and Informatics, 32(3), 425–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2014.10.006
  32. Hsiao, K. L. (2017). Compulsive mobile application usage and technostress: The role of personality traits. Online Information Review, 41(2), 272–295. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-03-2016-0091
  33. Hsiao, K. L., Shu, Y., & Huang, T. C. (2017). Exploring the effect of compulsive social app usage on technostress and academic performance: Perspectives from personality traits. Telematics and Informatics, 34(2), 679–690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2016.11.001
  34. Hughes, N., & Burke, J. (2018). Sleeping with the frenemy: How restricting “bedroom use” of smartphones impacts happiness and wellbeing. Computers in Human Behavior, 85, 236–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.03.047
  35. Hung, W. H., Chen, K., & Lin, C. P. (2015). Does the proactive personality mitigate the adverse effect of technostress on productivity in the mobile environment?. Telematics and Informatics, 32(1), 143–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2014.06.002
  36. Joo, J., & Sang, Y. (2013). Exploring Koreans’ smartphone usage: An integrated model of the technology acceptance model and uses and gratifications theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), 2512–2518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.06.002
  37. Katz, E., Blumler, J. G., & Gurevitch, M. (1974). Uses and gratifications research. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 37(4), 509–523. https://doi.org/10.1086/268109
  38. Kim, M. K., Wong, S. F., Chang, Y., & Park, J. H. (2016). Determinants of customer loyalty in the Korean smartphone market: Moderating effects of usage characteristics. Telematics and Informatics, 33(4), 936–949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2016.02.006
  39. Krasnova, H., Veltri, N. F., Eling, N., & Buxmann, P. (2017). Why men and women continue to use social networking sites: The role of gender differences. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 26(4), 261–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2017.01.004
  40. Ku, Y. C., Chen, R., & Zhang, H. (2013). Why do users continue using social networking sites? An exploratory study of members in the United States and Taiwan. Information & Management, 50(7), 571–581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2013.07.011
  41. LaRose, R., & Eastin, M. S. (2004). A social cognitive theory of Internet uses and gratifications: Toward a new model of media attendance. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 48(3), 358–377. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15506878jobem4803_2
  42. Lavoie, J. A., & Pychyl, T. A. (2001). Cyberslacking and the procrastination superhighway: A web-based survey of online procrastination, attitudes, and emotion. Social Science Computer Review, 19(4), 431–444. https://doi.org/10.1177/089443930101900403
  43. Lazarus, R. S. (1966). Psychological stress and the coping process. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
  44. Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company.
  45. Lee, Y. K., Chang, C. T., Lin, Y., & Cheng, Z. H. (2014). The dark side of smartphone usage: Psychological traits, compulsive behavior and technostress. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 373–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.047
  46. Li, H., Liu, Y., Xu, X., Heikkilä, J., & van der Heijden, H. (2015). Modeling hedonic IS continuance through the uses and gratifications theory: An empirical study in online games. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 261–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.053
  47. Lin, C. A. (1996). Standpoint: Looking back: The contribution of Blumler and Katz’s uses of mass communication to communication research. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 40(4), 574–581.
  48. Lune, H., & Berg, B. L. (2017). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (9th ed.). Harlow, UK: Pearson Education.
  49. Luqman, A., Cao, X., Ali, A., Masood, A., & Yu, L. (2017). Empirical investigation of Facebook discontinues usage intentions based on SOR paradigm. Computers in Human Behavior, 70, 544–555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.020
  50. Luqman, A., Masood, A., Shahzad, F., Shahbaz, M., & Feng, Y. (2021). Untangling the adverse effects of late-night usage of smartphone-based SNS among University students. Behaviour & Information Technology, 40(15), 1671–1687. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2020.1773538
  51. Maier, C., Laumer, S., Eckhardt, A., & Weitzel, T. (2015). Giving too much social support: Social overload on social networking sites. European Journal of Information Systems, 24(5), 447–464. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2014.3
  52. Maier, C., Laumer, S., Weinert, C., & Weitzel, T. (2015). The effects of technostress and switching stress on discontinued use of social networking services: A study of Facebook use. Information Systems Journal, 25(3), 275–308. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12068
  53. Malik, A., Dhir, A., Kaur, P., & Johri, A. (2021). Correlates of social media fatigue and academic performance decrement. Information Technology & People, 34(2), 557–580. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-06-2019-0289
  54. Mäntymäki, M., & Riemer, K. (2014). Digital natives in social virtual worlds: A multi-method study of gratifications and social influences in Habbo Hotel. International Journal of Information Management, 34(2), 210–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2013.12.010
  55. Min, S. J. (2019). From algorithmic disengagement to algorithmic activism: Charting social media users’ responses to news filtering algorithms. Telematics and Informatics, 43, 101251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2019.101251
  56. Myers, M. D. (1997). Qualitative research in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 21(2), 241–242. MISQ Discovery, archival version, June 1997, http://www.misq.org/discovery/MISQD_isworld/. MISQ Discovery, updated version, last modified: January 4, 2008 http://www.qual.auckland.ac.nz/
  57. Myers, M. D., & Newman, M. (2007). The qualitative interview in IS research: Examining the craft. Information and Organization, 17(1), 2–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2006.11.001
  58. Nastjuk, I., Trang, S., Grummeck-Braamt, J. V., Adam, M. T., & Tarafdar, M. (2024). Integrating and synthesising technostress research: a meta-analysis on technostress creators, outcomes, and IS usage contexts. European Journal of Information Systems, 33(3), 361–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2022.2154712
  59. Palmgreen, P., & Rayburn, J. D. (1979). Uses and gratifications and exposure to public television: A discrepancy approach. Communication Research, 6(2), 155–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365027900600203
  60. Palmgreen, P., Wenner, L. A., & Rayburn, J. D. (1980). Relations between gratifications sought and obtained: A study of television news. Communication Research, 7(2), 161–192.
  61. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
  62. Pirkkalainen, H., Salo, M., Tarafdar, M., & Makkonen, M. (2019). Deliberate or instinctive? Proactive and reactive coping for technostress. Journal of Management Information Systems, 36(4), 1179–1212. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2019.1661092
  63. Qi, C. (2019). A double-edged sword? Exploring the impact of students’ academic usage of mobile devices on technostress and academic performance. Behaviour & Information Technology, 38(12), 1337–1354. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2019.1585476
  64. Quan-Haase, A., & Young, A. L. (2010). Uses and gratifications of social media: A comparison of Facebook and instant messaging. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 30(5), 350–361. https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467610380009
  65. Ragu-Nathan, T. S., Tarafdar, M., Ragu-Nathan, B. S., & Tu, Q. (2008). The consequences of technostress for end users in organizations: Conceptual development and empirical validation. Information Systems Research, 19(4), 417–433. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1070.0165
  66. Ravindran, T., Yeow Kuan, A. C., & Hoe Lian, D. G. (2014). Antecedents and effects of social network fatigue. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(11), 2306–2320. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23122
  67. Roberts, J. A., & David, M. E. (2023). Instagram and TikTok flow states and their association with psychological well-being. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 26(2), 80-89. ttps://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2022.0117
  68. Rokito, S., Choi, Y. H., Taylor, S. H., & Bazarova, N. N. (2019). Over-gratified, under-gratified, or just right? Applying the gratification discrepancy approach to investigate recurrent Facebook use. Computers in Human Behavior, 93, 76–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.11.041
  69. Rubin, A. M. (1984). Ritualized and instrumental television viewing. Journal of Communication, 34(3), 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1984.tb02174.x
  70. Ruggiero, T. E. (2000). Uses and gratifications theory in the 21st century. Mass Communication & Society, 3(1), 3–37. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327825MCS0301_02
  71. Saldaña, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
  72. Salo, M., Pirkkalainen, H., & Koskelainen, T. (2019). Technostress and social networking services: Explaining users’ concentration, sleep, identity, and social relation problems. Information Systems Journal, 29(2), 408–435. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12213
  73. Salo, M., Pirkkalainen, H., Chua, C. E. H., & Koskelainen, T. (2022). Formation and mitigation of technostress in the personal use of IT. MIS Quarterly, 46(2), 1073–1108. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2022/14950
  74. Savolainen, I., Oksa, R., Savela, N., Celuch, M., & Oksanen, A. (2021). COVID-19 anxiety—A longitudinal survey study of psychological and situational risks among Finnish workers. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(2), 794. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18020794
  75. Stafford, T. F., Stafford, M. R., & Schkade, L. L. (2004). Determining uses and gratifications for the Internet. Decision Sciences, 35(2), 259–288. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.00117315.2004.02524.x
  76. Steelman, Z. R., & Soror, A. A. (2017). Why do you keep doing that? The biasing effects of mental states on IT continued usage intentions. Computers in Human Behavior, 73, 209–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.027
  77. Sun, J., & Lee, S. K. (2022). Flooded with too many messages? Predictors and consequences of instant messaging fatigue. Information Technology & People, 35(7), 2026–2042. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-03-2021-0239
  78. Sun, Y., Liu, Y., & Zhang, J. (2020). Excessive enterprise social media use behavior at work: Role of communication visibility and perspective of uses and gratifications theory. IEEE Access, 8, 190989–191004. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3032035
  79. Sundar, S. S., & Limperos, A. M. (2013). Uses and grats 2.0: New gratifications for new media. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 57(4), 504–525. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2013.845827
  80. Tarafdar, M., Cooper, C. L., & Stich, J. F. (2019). The technostress trifecta‐techno eustress, techno distress and design: Theoretical directions and an agenda for research. Information Systems Journal, 29(1), 6–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12169
  81. Tarafdar, M., Maier, C., Laumer, S., & Weitzel, T. (2020). Explaining the link between technostress and technology addiction for social networking sites: A study of distraction as a coping behavior. Information Systems Journal, 30(1), 96–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12253
  82. Tarafdar, M., Stich, J. F., Maier, C., & Laumer, S. (2024). Techno‐eustress creators: Conceptualization and empirical validation. Information Systems Journal, 34(6), 2097-2131. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12515
  83. Tarafdar, M., Tu, Q., Ragu-Nathan, B. S., & Ragu-Nathan, T. S. (2007). The impact of technostress on role stress and productivity. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(1), 301–328. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222240109
  84. Tarafdar, M., Tu, Q., Ragu-Nathan, T. S., & Ragu-Nathan, B. S. (2011). Crossing to the dark side: examining creators, outcomes, and inhibitors of technostress. Communications of the ACM, 54(9), 113–120. https://doi.org/10.1145/1995376.1995403
  85. Tugtekin, U., Barut Tugtekin, E., Kurt, A. A., & Demir, K. (2020). Associations between fear of missing out, problematic smartphone use, and social networking services fatigue among young adults. Social Media + Society, 6(4), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120963760
  86. van Deursen, A. J., & van Dijk, J. A. (2014). The digital divide shifts to differences in usage. New Media & Society, 16(3), 507–526. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813487959
  87. Whelan, E., Islam, A. N., & Brooks, S. (2020). Is boredom proneness related to social media overload and fatigue? A stress–strain–outcome approach. Internet Research, 30(3), 869–887. https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-03-2019-0112
  88. Yang, Y., Xu, J., Land, L. P. W., Yang, S., & Chesney, T. (2024). Exploring active and passive interactions in social networking services: a psychological needs perspective. Information Technology & People, 37(5), 1918-1949. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-07-2022-0563

How to Cite

Hämäläinen, A., Salo, M., & Pirkkalainen, H. (2024). Surfing, scrolling and stressing: Technostress in browsing digital content feeds on smartphones from the gratifications and dimensions of use perspective. Human Technology, 20(3), 640–675. https://doi.org/10.14254/1795-6889.2024.20-3.11