Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Articles
DOI: 10.14254/1795-6889.2024.20-2.4
Submitted: 2024-02-29
Published: 2024-09-05

On designing Shareish, an open-source, map-based, web platform to facilitate diverse solidarity practices

University of Liège
Haute École de la Province de Liège
University of Liège
University of Liège
University of Liège
Haute École de la Province de Liège
Haute École de la Province de Liège
University of Liège
University of Liege
solidarity HCI mutual aid gift economy open-source software online web application

Abstract

We present the Shareish web platform to foster diverse solidarity practices inspired by concepts of the gift economy. Its design is grounded in prior work (in CSCW and solidarity HCI), and in new qualitative research involving participants engaged in solidarity practices. Shareish aims at leveraging community assets through donations, free loans, requests of goods and services, free event announcements, and by enhancing the visibility of freely available resources. On a Shareish instance, users have the ability to view localized items on a map or in lists, utilize search filters, contribute new content with detailed textual and visual descriptions, engage in discussions with other users, and receive notifications when new content is added in their neighborhood. The platform can be replicated and improved by communities seeking autonomy as its source code is distributed freely under a permissive open source license (https://github.com/shareish). A research demonstration server is available (https://shareish.org).

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. Abou Amsha, Khuloud, Erik Gronvall, and Joanna Saad-Sulonen. 2023. “Emergent Collaborations Outside of Organizational Frameworks: Exploring Relevant Concepts.” In The 11th International Conference on Communities and Technologies (c&T). C&T ’23. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3593743.3593778. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3593743.3593778
  2. Ait, Adem, Javier Luis Cánovas Izquierdo, and Jordi Cabot. 2022. “An Empirical Study on the Survival Rate of Github Projects.” In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Mining Software Repositories, 365–75. MSR ’22. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3524842.3527941. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3524842.3527941
  3. Apeldoorn, Jacobien van, and Arthur Schram. 2016. “Indirect Reciprocity: A Field Experiment.” Edited by Pablo Brañas-Garza. PLOS ONE 11 (4): e0152076. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152076. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152076
  4. Armouch, Sarah, Shelina Visram, and Vasilis Vlachokyriakos. 2023. “Supporting Innovation in a Context of Uncertainty: The Role of Design and Technology.” In The 11th International Conference on Communities and Technologies (c&T). C&T ’23. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3593743.3593759. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3593743.3593759
  5. Auferbauer, D., and H. Tellioğlu. 2017. “Centralized Crowdsourcing in Disaster Management: Findings and Implications.” In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Communities and Technologies, 173–82. C&T ’17. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3083671.3083689. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3083671.3083689
  6. Avelino, Guilherme, Eleni Constantinou, Marco Tulio Valente, and Alexander Serebrenik. 2019. “On the Abandonment and Survival of Open Source Projects: An Empirical Investigation.” In 2019 ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM), 1–12. Porto de Galinhas, Brazil: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/esem.2019.8870181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ESEM.2019.8870181
  7. Badio, Sandrine. 2009. “Understanding Gleaning: Historical and Cultural Contexts of the Shift from Rural to Urban Models for the Improvement of Food Security.” Lakehead University; https://en.calameo.com/books/000625441f070cdf96277.
  8. Baumer, Eric P. S., and M. Six Silberman. 2011. “When the Implication Is Not to Design (Technology).” In Proceedings of the Sigchi Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. CHI ’11. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979275. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979275
  9. Belk, Russell. 2014. “Sharing Versus Pseudo-Sharing in Web 2.0.” The Anthropologist 18 (1): 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/09720073.2014.11891518. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09720073.2014.11891518
  10. Bellotti, Victoria, Alexander Ambard, Daniel Turner, Christina Gossmann, Kamila Demkova, and John M. Carroll. 2015. “A Muddle of Models of Motivation for Using Peer-to-Peer Economy Systems.” In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Acm Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1085–94. CHI ’15. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702272. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702272
  11. Bellotti, Victoria, John M. Carroll, and Kyungsik Han. 2013. “Random Acts of Kindness: The Intelligent and Context-Aware Future of Reciprocal Altruism and Community Collaboration.” In 2013 International Conference on Collaboration Technologies and Systems (Cts), 1–12. San Diego, CA, USA: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/CTS.2013.6567197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/CTS.2013.6567197
  12. Bellotti, Victoria M. E., Sara Cambridge, Karen Hoy, Patrick C. Shih, Lisa Renery Handalian, Kyungsik Han, and John M. Carroll. 2014. “Towards Community-Centered Support for Peer-to-Peer Service Exchange: Rethinking the Timebanking Metaphor.” In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2975–84. CHI ’14. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557061. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557061
  13. Bénel, Aurélien, and Christophe Lejeune. 2009. “Partager Des Corpus et Leurs Analyses à L’heure Du Web 2.0.” Degres 36-37 (January).
  14. Benveniste, É. 1969. Le Vocabulaire Des Institutions Indo-Européennes. v. 1-2. Les Editions de Minuit. https://books.google.be/books?id=bHv9ngEACAAJ.
  15. Berns, Katie, and Chiara Rossitto. 2019. “From Commodities to Gifts: Redistributing Surplus Food Locally.” In Ethnographies of Collaborative Economies.
  16. Berns, Katie, Chiara Rossitto, and Jakob Tholander. 2023. “Learning from Other Communities: Organising Collective Action in a Grassroots Food-Sharing Initiative.” Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 32 (4): 951–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-023-09468-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-023-09468-5
  17. Besse, Jean-Marc. 2023. Quelle Est La Raison Des Cartes? Editions 205.
  18. Bishop, Valerie, Daryl Bainbridge, Shilpa Kumar, Allison Williams, Madelyn Law, Barbara Pesut, Harvey Chochinov, and Hsien Seow. 2022. “The Impact of the Caremongering Social Media Movement: A Convergent Parallel Mixed‐methods Study.” Health &Amp; Social Care in the Community 30 (6). https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.13933. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.13933
  19. Boltanski, Luc, and Laurent Thévenot. 2006. On Justification: Economies of Worth. Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400827145
  20. Bolton, Gary E., Elena Katok, and Axel Ockenfels. 2005. “Cooperation Among Strangers with Limited Information About Reputation.” Journal of Public Economics 89 (8): 1457–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.03.008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.03.008
  21. Buoli, Alice. 2014. “From Power to Empowerment? The Social Role of Cartographic Knowledge.” In Innovative Technologies in Urban Mapping, 123–33. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03798-1_11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03798-1_11
  22. Callon, Michel. 1986. “ÉLÉMENTS POUR UNE SOCIOLOGIE DE LA TRADUCTION: La domestication des coquilles Saint-Jacques et des marins-pêcheurs dans la baie de Saint-Brieuc.” Année sociologique 36: 169–208.
  23. Carroll, John M., and Victoria Bellotti. 2015. “Creating Value Together: The Emerging Design Space of Peer-to-Peer Currency and Exchange.” In Proceedings of the 18th Acm Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, 1500–1510. CSCW ’15. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675270. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675270
  24. Česnuitytė, Vida, Andrzej Klimczuk, Cristina Miguel, and Gabriela Avram, eds. 2022. “The State and Critical Assessment of the Sharing Economy in Europe.” In The Sharing Economy in Europe: Developments, Practices, and Contradictions, 387–403. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86897-0_18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86897-0_18
  25. Charmaz, Kathy. 2006. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. SAGE. http://books.google.com?id=v1qP1KbXz1AC.
  26. Cheal, David J. 1988. The Gift Economy. London: Routledge.
  27. Coelho, Jailton, and Marco Tulio Valente. 2017. “Why Modern Open Source Projects Fail.” In Proceedings of the 2017 11th Joint Meeting on Foundations of Software Engineering, 186–96. ESEC/Fse 2017. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3106237.3106246. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3106237.3106246
  28. Cohen, Phil, and Mike Duggan, eds. 2021. New Directions in Radical Cartography. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/9781538147214
  29. Collom, E. 2012. “Key Indicators of Time Bank Participation: Using Transaction Data for Evaluation.” International Journal of Community Currency Research 16: 18–29. https://doi.org/10.15133/J.IJCCR.2012.002.
  30. Craig, William J., Trevor M. Harris, and Daniel Weiner, eds. 2002. Community Participation and Geographical Information Systems. London: CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203469484. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203469484
  31. Curry, Oliver Scott, Lee A. Rowland, Caspar J. Van Lissa, Sally Zlotowitz, John McAlaney, and Harvey Whitehouse. 2018. “Happy to Help? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Performing Acts of Kindness on the Well-Being of the Actor.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 76 (May): 320–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.02.014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.02.014
  32. Demaria, Federico, and Ashish Kothari. 2017. “The Post-Development Dictionary Agenda: Paths to the Pluriverse.” Third World Quarterly 38 (12): 2588–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2017.1350821. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2017.1350821
  33. Denil, Mark. 2011. “The Search for a Radical Cartography.” Cartographic Perspectives, no. 68 (March): 7–28. https://doi.org/10.14714/cp68.6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14714/CP68.6
  34. Depoorter, Gaël. 2020. “The Free Software Community: A Contemporary Space for Reconfiguring Struggles?” In Everyday Resistance: French Activism in the 21st Century, by Bruno Frère and Marc Jacquemain. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18987-7_6
  35. Dillahunt, Tawanna R., Xinyi Wang, Earnest Wheeler, Hao Fei Cheng, Brent Hecht, and Haiyi Zhu. 2017. “The Sharing Economy in Computing.” Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 1 (CSCW): 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1145/3134673. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3134673
  36. Farrier, Alan, Mark Dooris, and Adrian Morley. 2019. “Catalysing Change? A Critical Exploration of the Impacts of a Community Food Initiative on People, Place and Prosperity.” Landscape and Urban Planning 192 (December): 103663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103663. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103663
  37. Fedosov, Anton, Jeremı́as Albano, and Marc Langheinrich. 2018. “Supporting the Design of Sharing Economy Services: Learning from Technology-Mediated Sharing Practices of Both Digital and Physical Artifacts.” In Proceedings of the 10th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, 323–37. NordiCHI ’18. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3240167.3240203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3240167.3240203
  38. Fedosov, Anton, Mervin Cheok, and Elaine Huang. 2021. “Designing for Local Economies of Personal Artifacts.” In Proceedings of the 19th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 1–15. Zurich, Switzerland: European Society for Socially Embedded Technologies (EUSSET). https://doi.org/10.18420/ECSCW2021_P06.
  39. Fedosov, Anton, Airi Lampinen, William Odom, and Elaine M. Huang. 2021. “A Dozen Stickers on a Mailbox: Physical Encounters and Digital Interactions in a Local Sharing Community.” Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 4 (CSCW3). https://doi.org/10.1145/3432939. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3432939
  40. Fedosov, Anton, Liudmila Zavolokina, Sina Krumhard, and Elaine M. Huang. 2023. “‘This Could Be the Day I Die’: Unpacking Interpersonal and Systems Trust in a Local Sharing Economy Community.” In Extended Abstracts of the 2023 Chi Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. CHI ’23. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544549.3585744. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3544549.3585744
  41. Feng, Bo, Siyue Li, and Na Li. 2013. “Is a Profile Worth a Thousand Words? How Online Support-Seeker’s Profile Features May Influence the Quality of Received Support Messages.” Communication Research 43 (2): 253–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650213510942. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650213510942
  42. Firth, Rhiannon. 2014. “Critical Cartography as Anarchist Pedagogy? Ideas for Praxis Inspired by the 56a Infoshop Map Archive.” Interface: A Journal for and About Social Movements 6 (April): 156–84.
  43. Fitzmaurice, Connor J, Isak Ladegaard, William Attwood-Charles, Mehmet Cansoy, Lindsey B Carfagna, Juliet B Schor, and Robert Wengronowitz. 2018. “Domesticating the Market: Moral Exchange and the Sharing Economy.” Socio-Economic Review 18 (1): 81–102. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwy003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwy003
  44. Forestal, Jennifer. 2022. “Platform Socialism: How to Reclaim Our Digital Future from Big Tech.” Contemporary Political Theory Online First Articles (July): 1. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-022-00576-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-022-00576-3
  45. Fors, Per, and Tina Ringenson. 2023. “From Strangers to Neighbours : How the Sharing Economy Can Help Building and Maintaining Local Communities.” In Ethics and Sustainability in Digital Cultures, 184–203. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003367451. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003367451-12
  46. Fuchs, Christian. 2020. “The Utopian Internet, Computing, Communication, and Concrete Utopias: Reading William Morris, Peter Kropotkin, Ursula K. Le Guin, and P.m. In the Light of Digital Socialism.” tripleC: Communication, Capitalism Critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society 18 (1): 146–86. https://doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v18i1.1143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v18i1.1143
  47. Ganglbauer, Eva, Geraldine Fitzpatrick, Özge Subasi, and Florian Güldenpfennig. 2014. “Think Globally, Act Locally: A Case Study of a Free Food Sharing Community and Social Networking.” In Proceedings of the 17th Acm Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, 911–21. CSCW ’14. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2531602.2531664. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2531602.2531664
  48. Gibson-Graham, J. K. 2008. “Diverse Economies: Performative Practices for Other Worlds.” Progress in Human Geography 32 (5): 613–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132508090821. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132508090821
  49. Glückler, Johannes, and Jakob Hoffmann. 2021. “Time Banks as Transient Civic Organizations? Exploring the Dynamics of Decline.” In Knowledge and Civil Society, 131–46. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71147-4_7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71147-4_7
  50. Gorz, Andre, and Michel Bosquet. 1978. Ecologie et Politique. Paris, France: Editions du Seuil.
  51. Graeber, David. 2012. Debt: The First 5,000 Years. New York, NY, USA: Random House Inc.
  52. Graham, Mark, Stefano De Sabbata, and Matthew A. Zook. 2015. “Towards a Study of Information Geographies: (Im)mutable Augmentations and a Mapping of the Geographies of Information.” Geo: Geography and Environment 2 (1): 88–105. https://doi.org/10.1002/geo2.8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/geo2.8
  53. Graham, Mark, and Martin Dittus. 2022. Geographies of Digital Exclusion: Data and Inequality. Pluto Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv272452n.
  54. Guilliams, Adrien, Ulysse Rubens, Florent Banneux, Pierre Chapeau, and Raphaël Marée. 2023. “Shareish (Share &Amp; Cherish): An Open-Source, Map-Based, Web Platform to Foster Mutual Aid.” In The 11th International Conference on Communities and Technologies (c&T). C&T ’23. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3593743.3593790. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3593743.3593790
  55. Gutierrez, Miren. 2018. “Maputopias: Cartographies of Communication, Coordination and Action—the Cases of Ushahidi and Infoamazonia.” GeoJournal 84 (1): 101–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-018-9853-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-018-9853-8
  56. Hakim, Jamie, Andreas Chatzidakis, Jo Littler, Catherine Rottenberg, and Lynne Segal. 2020. The Care Manifesto. Verso Books.
  57. Hamm, Andrea, Yuya Shibuya, Stefan Ullrich, and Teresa Cerratto Cerratto Pargman. 2021. “What Makes Civic Tech Initiatives to Last over Time? Dissecting Two Global Cases.” In Proceedings of the 2021 Chi Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. CHI ’21. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445667. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445667
  58. Han, Kyungsik, Patrick C. Shih, Victoria Bellotti, and John M. Carroll. 2015. “It’s Time There Was an App for That Too.” International Journal of Mobile Human Computer Interaction 7 (2): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijmhci.2015040101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/ijmhci.2015040101
  59. Hawlitschek, Florian, Nicole Stofberg, Timm Teubner, Patrick Tu, and Christof Weinhardt. 2018. “How Corporate Sharewashing Practices Undermine Consumer Trust.” Sustainability 10 (8): 2638. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082638. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082638
  60. Healy, Stephen, Craig Borowiak, Marianna Pavlovskaya, and Maliha Safri. 2021. “Commoning and the Politics of Solidarity: Transformational Responses to Poverty.” Geoforum 127 (December): 306–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.03.015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.03.015
  61. Herne, Kaisa, Olli Lappalainen, and Elina Kestilä-Kekkonen. 2013. “Experimental Comparison of Direct, General, and Indirect Reciprocity.” The Journal of Socio-Economics 45 (August): 38–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2013.04.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2013.04.003
  62. Hiltz, S. Roxanne, Amanda Lee Hughes, Muhammad Imran, Linda Plotnick, Robert Power, and Murray Turoff. 2020. “Exploring the Usefulness and Feasibility of Software Requirements for Social Media Use in Emergency Management.” International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 42 (January): 101367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101367. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101367
  63. Hind, Sam. 2017. “Cartographic Care, or, Caretographies.” Living Maps Review, no. 3: 1–14.
  64. Houdt, Greg Van, Carlos Mosquera, and Gonzalo Nápoles. 2020. “A Review on the Long Short-Term Memory Model.” Artificial Intelligence Review 53 (8): 5929–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-020-09838-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-020-09838-1
  65. Illich, I. 1973. Tools for Conviviality. Cass Canfield Book. Harper & Row.
  66. Jones, Lee, Alaa Nousir, Tom Everrett, and Sara Nabil. 2023a. “Libraries of Things: Understanding the Challenges of Sharing Tangible Collections and the Opportunities for HCI.” In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581094. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581094
  67. ———. 2023b. “Tangible, Public, and Miniature Creative Exchanges: What Hci and Design Researchers Can Learn from the Free Little Art Gallery Movement.” In Creativity and Cognition. C&C ’23. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3591196.3593433. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3591196.3593433
  68. Keyes, Os, Josephine Hoy, and Margaret Drouhard. 2019. “Human-Computer Insurrection: Notes on an Anarchist Hci.” In Proceedings of the 2019 Chi Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–13. CHI ’19. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300569. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300569
  69. Kiden, Sarah, Angelika Strohmayer, and Joyce Yee. 2023. “Before the Tech Bit: Observations on the Workings of a Scottish Community Fridge.” In Companion Proceedings of the 2023 Acm International Conference on Supporting Group Work. GROUP ’23. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3565967.3571752. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3565967.3571752
  70. Kinna, Ruth, Alex Prichard, and Thomas Swann. 2023. Anarchic Agreements. Oakland, CA: PM Press.
  71. Knearem, Tiffany, Jeongwon Jo, Chun-Hua Tsai, and John M. Carroll. 2021. “Making Space for Support: An Exploratory Analysis of Pandemic-Response Mutual Aid Platforms.” In C&T 21: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Communities & Technologies - Wicked Problems in the Age of Tech, 38–43. C&T ’21. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3461564.3461567. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3461564.3461567
  72. Knutas, Antti, Victoria Palacin, Giovanni Maccani, Pablo Aragon, Annika Wolff, and Lukas Mocek. 2022. “Civic Code for Social Change: Lessons in Civic Tech Grassroots for Software Engineers.” IEEE Software 39 (6): 64–72. https://doi.org/10.1109/ms.2022.3179670. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MS.2022.3179670
  73. Kothari, Ashish, Ariel Salleh, Arturo Escobar, Federico Demaria, and Alberto Acosta, eds. 2019. Pluriverse. A Post-Development Dictionary. New Delhi: Tulika Books.
  74. Kraak, Menno-Jan, and Sara Irina Fabrikant. 2017. “Of Maps, Cartography and the Geography of the International Cartographic Association.” International Journal of Cartography 3 (sup1): 9–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/23729333.2017.1288535. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23729333.2017.1288535
  75. Kropotkin, Piotr Alexeievich. 1902. Mutual Aid: A Factor or Evolution. New York, NY, USA: McClure Phillips; Co.
  76. Kumar, Amit, and Nicholas Epley. 2023. “A Little Good Goes an Unexpectedly Long Way: Underestimating the Positive Impact of Kindness on Recipients.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 152 (1): 236–52. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001271. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001271
  77. Lampinen, Airi. 2021. The Trouble with Sharing: Interpersonal Challenges in Peer-to-Peer Exchange. Synthesis Lectures on Human-Centered Informatics. San Rafael, California (USA): Morgan; Claypool publishers. https://doi.org/10.2200/S01116ED1V01Y202107HCI051. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-02234-0
  78. Lampinen, Airi, Donald McMillan, Barry Brown, Zarah Faraj, Deha Nemutlu Cambazoglu, and Christian Virtala. 2017. “Friendly but Not Friends: Designing for Spaces Between Friendship and Unfamiliarity.” In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Communities and Technologies, 169–72. CT’17 ’17. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3083671.3083677. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3083671.3083677
  79. Lampinen, Airi, Chiara Rossitto, and Christofer Gradin Franzén. 2019. “Scaling Out, Scaling down : Reconsidering Growth in Grassroots Initiatives.” In Ethnographies of Collaborative Economies Conference Proceedings. Edinburgh: Stockholm University, Department of Computer; Systems Sciences; COST Action From Sharing to Caring: The Socio-Technical Aspects of the Collaborative Economy.
  80. Lange, Bastiand, Marta Hülz, Benedikt Schmid, and Christian Schulz, eds. 2021. Post-Growth Geographies: Spatial Relations of Diverse and Alternative Economies. Sozial- Und Kulturgeographie. transcript Verlag. https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839457337. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839457337
  81. Larsen-Ledet, Ida, Ann Light, Airi Lampinen, Joanna Saad-Sulonen, Katie Berns, Negar Khojasteh, and Chiara Rossitto. 2022. “(Un) Scaling Computing.” Interactions 29 (5): 72–77. https://doi.org/10.1145/3554926. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3554926
  82. Laurin-Lamothe, Audrey, Frédéric Legault, and Simon Tremblay-Pepin. 2023. Construire L’économie Postcapitaliste. Lux Editeur.
  83. Lejeune, Christophe. 2011. “From Virtual Communities to Project-Driven Mediated Collectives: A Comparison of Debian, Wikipedia and the Open Directory Project.” In Collaborative Search and Communities of Interest, 10–20. IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-61520-841-8.ch002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-61520-841-8.ch002
  84. ———. 2019. Manuel d’analyse qualitative: analyser sans compter ni classer. 2e éd. Méthodes en sciences humaines. Louvain-la-Neuve: De Boeck.
  85. Light, Ann, and Clodagh Miskelly. 2015. “Sharing Economy Vs Sharing Cultures? Designing for Social, Economic and Environmental Good.” Interaction Design and Architecture(s) 24: 49–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55612/s-5002-024-003
  86. ———. 2019. “Platforms, Scales and Networks: Meshing a Local Sustainable Sharing Economy.” Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 28 (3-4): 591–626. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-019-09352-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-019-09352-1
  87. Littman, Danielle M., Madi Boyett, Kimberly Bender, Annie Zean Dunbar, Marisa Santarella, Trish Becker-Hafnor, Kate Saavedra, and Tara Milligan. 2022. “Values and Beliefs Underlying Mutual Aid: An Exploration of Collective Care During the Covid-19 Pandemic.” Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research 13 (1): 89–115. https://doi.org/10.1086/716884. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/716884
  88. López, Claudia, and Rosta Farzan. 2015. “Lend Me Sugar, I Am Your Neighbor! A Content Analysis of Online Forums for Local Communities.” In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Communities and Technologies, 59–67. CT’15. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2768545.2768558. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2768545.2768558
  89. López, Claudia, Rosta Farzan, and Yu-Ru Lin. 2017. “Behind the Myths of Citizen Participation: Identifying Sustainability Factors of Hyper-Local Information Systems.” ACM Transactions on Internet Technology 18 (1): 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1145/3093892. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3093892
  90. Luckner, N., G. Fitzpatrick, K. Werner, and Ö. and Subasi. 2015. “Setting up and Running a Sharing Service: An Organisational Perspective.” Interaction Design and Architecture(s) Journal 24 (Peer-to-Peer Exchange and the Sharing Economy: Analysis, Designs, and Implications): 63–80. http://ixdea.uniroma2.it/inevent/events/idea2010/index.php?s=10&a=10&link=ToC_24_P. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55612/s-5002-024-004
  91. Lynch, Casey R. 2019. “Contesting Digital Futures: Urban Politics, Alternative Economies, and the Movement for Technological Sovereignty in Barcelona.” Antipode 52 (3): 660–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12522. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12522
  92. Mao, Guanlan, Maria Fernandes-Jesus, Evangelos Ntontis, and John Drury. 2021. “What Have We Learned About COVID-19 Volunteering in the UK? A Rapid Review of the Literature.” BMC Public Health 21 (July). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11390-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11390-8
  93. March, Hug. 2018. “The Smart City and Other Ict-Led Techno-Imaginaries: Any Room for Dialogue with Degrowth?” Journal of Cleaner Production 197 (October): 1694–1703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.154
  94. Marshman, Jennifer, and Steffanie Scott. 2019. “Gleaning in the 21st Century: Urban Food Recovery and Community Food Security in Ontario, Canada.” Canadian Food Studies / La Revue Canadienne Des études Sur L’alimentation 6 (1): 100–119. https://doi.org/10.15353/cfs-rcea.v6i1.264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15353/cfs-rcea.v6i1.264
  95. Martin, Chris J. 2016. “The Sharing Economy: A Pathway to Sustainability or a Nightmarish Form of Neoliberal Capitalism?” Ecological Economics 121 (January): 149–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.11.027. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.11.027
  96. Masden, Christina A., Catherine Grevet, Rebecca E. Grinter, Eric Gilbert, and W. Keith Edwards. 2014. “Tensions in Scaling-up Community Social Media: A Multi-Neighborhood Study of Nextdoor.” In Proceedings of the Sigchi Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 3239–48. CHI ’14. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557319. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557319
  97. Mauss, Marcel. 1954. The Gift: Forms and Functions of Exchange in Archiac Societies. London: Cohen & West.
  98. McFarlane, Colin, and Ola Söderström. 2017. “On Alternative Smart Cities: From a Technology-Intensive to a Knowledge-Intensive Smart Urbanism.” City 21 (3–4): 312–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2017.1327166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2017.1327166
  99. McLaren, Duncan, and Julian Agyeman, eds. 2015. A Case for Truly Smart and Sustainable Cities. Boston: MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262029728.001.0001
  100. Mies, Maria, and Veronika Bennholdt-Thomsen. 1999. The Subsistence Perspective : Beyond the Globalized Economy. New York (N.Y.) : Zed books.
  101. Miguel, Cristina, Gabriela Avram, Andrzej Klimczuk, Bori Simonovits, Bálint Balázs, and Vida Česnuitytė. 2022. “The Sharing Economy in Europe: From Idea to Reality.” In The Sharing Economy in Europe: Developments, Practices, and Contradictions, 3–18. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86897-0_1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86897-0_1
  102. Moalem, Rikke Marie, and Mette Alberg Mosgaard. 2021. “A Critical Review of the Role of Repair Cafés in a Sustainable Circular Transition.” Sustainability 13 (22): 12351. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212351. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212351
  103. Molm, Linda D., Jessica L. Collett, and David R. Schaefer. 2007. “Building Solidarity Through Generalized Exchange: A Theory of Reciprocity.” American Journal of Sociology 113 (1): 205–42. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/517900. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/517900
  104. Monticelli, Lara, ed. 2022. The Future Is Now: An Introduction to Prefigurative Politics: The Future Is Now. 1st ed. Bristol University Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv2x00vn2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56687/9781529215687-006
  105. Moody, Michael. 2008. “Serial Reciprocity: A Preliminary Statement.” Sociological Theory 26 (2): 130–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9558.2008.00322.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9558.2008.00322.x
  106. Morozov, Evgeny. 2013. To Save Everything, Click Here: Technology, Solutionism and the Urge to Fix Problems That Don’t Exist. Allen Lane. http://books.google.com?id=K3qtMQEACAAJ.
  107. Morozov, E. 2019. “Digital Socialism? The Calculation Debate in the Age of Big Data.” New Left Review 116/117. https://newleftreview.org/issues/ii116/articles/evgeny-morozov-digital-socialism.
  108. Muldoon, James. 2022a. “Building Civic Platforms.” In Platform Socialism: How to Reclaim Our Digital Future from Big Tech, 101–18. London: Pluto Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv272454p.10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv272454p.10
  109. Muldoon, J. (2022). Data-owning democracy or digital socialism? Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2022.2120737 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2022.2120737
  110. North, Peter. 2017. “Geographies of Alternative, Complementary and Community Currencies.” In Handbook on the Geographies of Money and Finance, 518–38. Cheltenham Glos, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784719005.00031. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784719005.00031
  111. Nowak, Martin A., and Karl Sigmund. 2005. “Evolution of Indirect Reciprocity.” Nature 437 (7063): 1291–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04131
  112. Ntouros, Vasilis, Hara Kouki, and Vasilis Vlachokyriakos. 2021. “Designing Sharing Economy Platforms Through a Solidarity HCI Lens.” Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5 (CSCW1): 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1145/3449097. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3449097
  113. Okada, Isamu. 2020. “A Review of Theoretical Studies on Indirect Reciprocity.” Games 11 (3): 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/g11030027. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/g11030027
  114. Pan, Wenjing, Bo Feng, V. Skye Wingate, and Siyue Li. 2020. “What to Say When Seeking Support Online: A Comparison Among Different Levels of Self-Disclosure.” Frontiers in Psychology 11 (June). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00978. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00978
  115. Parker, Brenda. 2006. “Constructing Community Through Maps? Power and Praxis in Community Mapping.” The Professional Geographer 58 (4): 470–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9272.2006.00583.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9272.2006.00583.x
  116. Payne, Will. 2017. “Welcome to the Polygon: Contested Digital Neighborhoods and Spatialized Segregation on Nextdoor.” Computational Culture 6: Geographies of Software. http://computationalculture.net/welcome-to-the-polygon-contested-digital-neighborhoods-and-spatialized-segregation-on-nextdoor/.
  117. Pérez-Pérez, Cristina, Diana Benito-Osorio, Susana María García-Moreno, and Andrés Martínez-Fernández. 2021. “Is Sharing a Better Alternative for the Planet? The Contribution of Sharing Economy to Sustainable Development Goals.” Sustainability 13 (4): 1843. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041843. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041843
  118. p.m. 2009. “It’s All About Potatoes and Computers: Recipes for the Cook-Shops of the Future.” Turbulence 5: 17–23.
  119. Poderi, Giacomo. 2019. “Sustaining Platforms as Commons: Perspectives on Participation, Infrastructure, and Governance.” CoDesign 15 (3): 243–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2019.1631351. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2019.1631351
  120. Qiu, Huilian Sophie, Anna Lieb, Jennifer Chou, Megan Carneal, Jasmine Mok, Emily Amspoker, Bogdan Vasilescu, and Laura Dabbish. 2023. “Climate Coach: A Dashboard for Open-Source Maintainers to Overview Community Dynamics.” In Proceedings of the 2023 Chi Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. CHI ’23. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581317. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581317
  121. Ribera-Fumaz, Ramon. 2019. “Moving from Smart Citizens to Technological Sovereignty?” In The Right to the Smart City, 177–91. Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78769-139-120191013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78769-139-120191013
  122. Ridnik, Tal, Emanuel Ben-Baruch, Asaf Noy, and Lihi Zelnik. 2021. “ImageNet-21K Pretraining for the Masses.” In Proceedings of the Neural Information Processing Systems Track on Datasets and Benchmarks, edited by J. Vanschoren and S. Yeung. Vol. 1. San Diego, CA: Curran Associates, Inc.
  123. Rossitto, Chiara, Airi Lampinen, Ann Light, Vera Diogo, Aniko Bernat, and Penny Travlou. 2021. “Chapter 5. Why Are We Still Using Facebook? The Platform Paradox in Collaborative Community Initiatives.” In Becoming a Platform in Europe: On the Governance of the Collaborative Economy. Delft: Now Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1561/9781680838411.ch5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1561/9781680838411.ch5
  124. Sahlins, Marshall David. 1974. Stone Age Economics. London: Tavistock Publications.
  125. Saros, Daniel E. 2014. Information Technology and Socialist Construction. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315814001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315814001
  126. Schägg, Elena, Stefanie L. Becker, and Prajal Pradhan. 2022. “Thwarted Visions of Change: Power and Demographics in Repair Cafes and Urban Sustainability Transitions.” Urban Transformations 4 (1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42854-022-00031-x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s42854-022-00031-x
  127. Schmid, Benedikt. 2019. “Degrowth and Postcapitalism: Transformative Geographies Beyond Accumulation and Growth.” Geography Compass 13 (11). https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12470. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12470
  128. Schmid, B. 2021. “Spatial Strategies for a Post-Growth Transformation.” In Post-Growth Geographies, 61–84. transcript Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783839457337-005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783839457337-005
  129. Scholz, Trebor. 2016. “Platform Cooperativism. Challenging the Corporate Sharing Economy.” New York.
  130. Schor, Juliet B., and Steven P. Vallas. 2021. “The Sharing Economy: Rhetoric and Reality.” Annual Review of Sociology 47 (1): 369–89. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-082620-031411. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-082620-031411
  131. Segal, Howard P. 2017. “Practical Utopias: America as Techno-Fix Nation.” Utopian Studies 28 (2): 231–46. https://doi.org/10.5325/utopianstudies.28.2.0231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5325/utopianstudies.28.2.0231
  132. Seow, Hsien, Kayla McMillan, Margaret Civak, Daryl Bainbridge, Alison van der Wal, Christa Haanstra, Jodeme Goldhar, and Samantha Winemaker. 2021. “#Caremongering: A Community-Led Social Movement to Address Health and Social Needs During COVID-19.” Edited by Holly Seale. PLOS ONE 16 (1): e0245483. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245483. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245483
  133. Seyfang, Gill, and Noel Longhurst. 2013. “Growing Green Money? Mapping Community Currencies for Sustainable Development.” Ecological Economics 86 (February): 65–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.11.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.11.003
  134. Sharma, Vishal, Neha Kumar, and Bonnie Nardi. 2023. “Post-Growth Human–Computer Interaction.” ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 31 (1): 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1145/3624981. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3624981
  135. Sieber, Renee. 2006. “Public Participation Geographic Information Systems: A Literature Review and Framework.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 96 (3): 491–507. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.2006.00702.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.2006.00702.x
  136. Soch, Nathan N, Michael Hogan, Owen Harney, Michelle Hanlon, Catherine Brady, and Liam McGrattan. 2022. “Developing a Utopian Model of Human-Technology Interaction: Collective Intelligence Applications in Support of Future Well-Being.” Utop. Stud. 33 (1): 54–75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5325/utopianstudies.33.1.0054
  137. Spade, Dean. 2020. “Solidarity Not Charity: Mutual Aid for Mobilization and Survival.” Social Text 38 (1 (142)): 131–51. https://doi.org/10.1215/01642472-7971139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/01642472-7971139
  138. Suhonen, Emmi, Airi Lampinen, Coye Cheshire, and Judd Antin. 2010. “Everyday Favors: A Case Study of a Local Online Gift Exchange System.” In Proceedings of the 2010 Acm International Conference on Supporting Group Work, 11–20. GROUP ’10. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/1880071.1880074. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1880071.1880074
  139. Swann, Thomas. 2022. “‘Anarchist Technologies’: Anarchism, Cybernetics and Mutual Aid in Community Responses to the COVID-19 Crisis.” Organization 30 (1): 193–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/13505084221090632. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/13505084221090632
  140. Teli, Maurizio, Myriam Lewkowicz, Chiara Rossitto, and Susanne Bødker. 2021. “Understanding, Promoting, and Designing for Sustainable Appropriation of Technologies by Grassroots Communities. Towards a New Wave of Technological Activism: Sustainable Appropriation of Technologies by Grassroots Communities.” In C&T ’21: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Communities & Technologies - Wicked Problems in the Age of Tech, 332–35. C&T ’21. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3461564.3468163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3461564.3468163
  141. Travlou, Penny. 2021. “Kropotkin-19: A Mutual Aid Response to Covid-19 in Athens.” Design and Culture 13 (1): 65–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/17547075.2020.1864119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17547075.2020.1864119
  142. Trivers, Robert. 2006. “Reciprocal Altruism: 30 Years Later.” Cooperation in Primates and Humans: Mechanisms and Evolution, 67–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-28277-7_4
  143. Tzanidou, Alexandra, and Vasilis Vlachokyriakos. 2022. “Participatory, Location-Based Systems in Community Place-Making.” In 2022 7th South-East Europe Design Automation, Computer Engineering, Computer Networks and Social Media Conference (Seeda-Cecnsm). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/seeda-cecnsm57760.2022.9933009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/SEEDA-CECNSM57760.2022.9933009
  144. Vadiati, Niloufar. 2022. “Alternatives to Smart Cities: A Call for Consideration of Grassroots Digital Urbanism.” Digital Geography and Society 3: 100030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diggeo.2022.100030. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diggeo.2022.100030
  145. Vaughan, Genevieve. 2021. “The Unilateral Gift Economy Conjecture.” American Review of Political Economy 16 (1). https://doi.org/10.38024/arpe.vg.1.6.21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.38024/arpe.vg.1.6.21
  146. Viorres, Nikos, Papadopoulos Xenofon, Modestos Stavrakis, Evangelos Vlachogiannis, Panayiotis Koutsabasis, and John Darzentas. 2007. “Major HCI Challenges for Open Source Software Adoption and Development.” In Online Communities and Social Computing, 455–64. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73257-0_50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73257-0_50
  147. Vlachokyriakos, Vasillis, Clara Crivellaro, Pete Wright, Evika Karamagioli, Eleni-Revekka Staiou, Dimitris Gouscos, Rowan Thorpe, et al. 2017. “HCI, Solidarity Movements and the Solidarity Economy.” In Proceedings of the 2017 Chi Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 3126–37. CHI ’17. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025490. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025490
  148. Wilde, Oscar. 1900. The Soul of Man. Arthur L. Humpreys. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv272452n. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv272452n
  149. Wilson, K. R., O. M. Roskill, and J. Mahr. 2022. “Mutual Aid Using Digital Technology: A Case Study of Virtual Community Organizing During the COVID-19 Pandemic.” Journal of Community Practice 30 (3): 255–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705422.2022.2102101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10705422.2022.2102101
  150. Wilson-Thomas, Juliette. 2015. “’Time Eases All Things’ : A Critical Study of How Time Banks Attempt to Use Time-Based Currency to Alleviate Social Exclusion.” PhD thesis, University of Salford. http://usir.salford.ac.uk/id/eprint/37721/.
  151. ———. 2021. “Time’s up: Analyzing the Feminist Potential of Time Banks.” Gender, Work & Organization 28 (6): 2114–31. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12691. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12691
  152. Wright, Erik Olin. 2012. “Transforming Capitalism Through Real Utopias.” American Sociological Review 78 (1): 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122412468882. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122412468882
  153. Yoeli, Erez, Moshe Hoffman, David G. Rand, and Martin A. Nowak. 2013. “Powering up with Indirect Reciprocity in a Large-Scale Field Experiment.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110 (supplement_2): 10424–9. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1301210110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1301210110
  154. Yu, Bo, and Guoray Cai. 2009. “Facilitating Participatory Decision-Making in Local Communities Through Map-Based Online Discussion.” In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Communities & Technologies, 215–24. C&T ’09. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/1556460.1556492. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1556460.1556492
  155. Yuan, Mingliang, Giuliana Spadaro, Shuxian Jin, Junhui Wu, Yu Kou, Paul A. M. Van Lange, and Daniel Balliet. 2022. “Did Cooperation Among Strangers Decline in the United States? A Cross-Temporal Meta-Analysis of Social Dilemmas (19562017).” Psychological Bulletin 148 (3-4): 129–57. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000363. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000363
  156. Zain, Eli. 2023. “Mutual Aid, Movement Building, and a Case Study of the Denver Community Fridges.” University of Colorado; https://search.proquest.com/openview/1f8aca80495684c8348b693c2c10a98e/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y.
  157. Zhang, Qi, Ling Liu, Calton Pu, Qiwei Dou, Liren Wu, and Wei Zhou. 2018. “A Comparative Study of Containers and Virtual Machines in Big Data Environment.” In 2018 IEEE 11th International Conference on Cloud Computing (CLOUD), 178–85. San Francisco, CA, USA: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/cloud.2018.00030. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/CLOUD.2018.00030
  158. Zhou, Youjia, and Chen Dong. 2023. “Nourishing Social Solidarity in Exchanging Gifts: A Study on Social Exchange in Shanghai Communities During Covid-19 Lockdown.” Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 10 (1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02152-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02152-5
  159. Zhu, Jiang, and Olivera Marjanovic. 2021. “A Different Kind of Sharing Economy: A Literature Review of Platform Cooperatives.” In Proceedings of the 54th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. HICSS. Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. https://doi.org/10.24251/hicss.2021.502. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2021.502
  160. Zwer, Nepthys, and Philippe Rekacewicz. 2021. Cartographie Radicale - Explorations. La Découverte.

How to Cite

Guilliams, A., Banneux, F., Rubens, U., Gason, O., Chapeau, P., Sevinç, O., Hoyoux, A., Lejeune, C., & Maree, R. (2024). On designing Shareish, an open-source, map-based, web platform to facilitate diverse solidarity practices. Human Technology, 20(2), 285–324. https://doi.org/10.14254/1795-6889.2024.20-2.4